Conserved mechanism for vacuolar magnesium sequestration in yeast and plant cells
Abstract
Magnesium (Mg 2+ ) is an essential nutrient for all life forms. In fungal and plant cells, the majority of Mg 2+ is stored in the vacuole but mechanisms for Mg 2+ transport into the vacuolar store are not fully understood. Here we demonstrate that members of ancient conserved domain proteins (ACDPs) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana function in vacuolar Mg 2+ sequestration that enables plant and yeast cells to cope with high levels of external Mg 2+ . We show that the yeast genome (as well as other fungal genomes) harbour a single ACDP homologue, referred to as MAM3, that functions specifically in vacuolar Mg 2+ accumulation and is essential for tolerance to high Mg. In parallel, vacuolar ACDP homologues were identified from Arabidopsis and shown to complement the yeast mutant mam3Δ. An Arabidopsis mutant lacking one of the vacuolar ACDP homologues displayed hypersensitivity to high-Mg conditions and accumulated less Mg in the vacuole compared with the wild type. Taken together, our results suggest that conserved transporters mediate vacuolar Mg 2+ sequestration in fungal and plant cells to maintain cellular Mg 2+ homeostasis in response to fluctuating Mg 2+ levels in the environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One common mechanism for Mg2+ storage is membrane-bound vacuoles, as seen in S. cerevisiae and higher plants, but this mechanism has not been documented in bacteria.
“One common mechanism for Mg2+ storage is membrane-bound vacuoles, as seen in S. cerevisiae and higher plants,78 but this mechanism has not been documented in bacteria.”
From Metals in Motion: Understanding Labile Metal Pools in Bacteria (2025) · cites this paper as [78]
Cites
Cunningham, K. W., & Fink, G. R. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.5.2226 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metals in Motion: Understanding Labile Metal Pools in Bacteria
Helmann, J. D. (2025) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.4c00726 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tang, R.-J., Meng, S.-F., Zheng, X.-J., Zhang, B., Yang, Y., Wang, C., Fu, A.-G., Zhao, F.-G., Lan, W.-Z., & Luan, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
- Northwest University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Lan, Wen-Zhi
- Luan, Sheng
- Venue
- Nature Plants
- Published
- 2022-01-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-190
- ISSN
- 2055-026X (ISSN-L)
- 2055-0278
- OpenAlex
- W4210389752
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Plants (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Magnesium in Health and Disease
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Keywords
- magnesium homeostasis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis thaliana
- MeSH terms
- Magnesium, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis Proteins, Plant Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review