Cited by 16Plant Molecular Biology ResearchLight effects on plantsPlant Parasitism and Resistance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ARF degradation defines a deeply conserved step in auxin response

Open access
de Roij, Martijn, Hernández García, Jorge, Das, Shubhajit, Borst, Jan Willem, Weijers, Dolf·2025·Nature Plants

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In land plants, the signalling molecule auxin profoundly controls growth and development, chiefly through a transcriptional response system. The auxin response is mediated by modulating the activity of DNA-binding auxin response factor (ARF) proteins. The concentrations and stoichiometry of the competing A- and B-class ARFs define cells’ capacity for auxin response. In the minimal auxin response system of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha , both A- and B-ARFs are unstable, but the underlying mechanisms, developmental relevance and evolutionary history of this instability are unknown. Here we identify a minimal motif that is necessary for MpARF2 (B-class) degradation and show that it is critical for development and the auxin response. Through comparative analysis and motif swaps among all ARF classes in extant algae and land plants, we infer that the emergence of ARF instability probably occurred in the ancestor of the A- and B-ARF clades and, therefore, preceded or coincided with the origin of the auxin response system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41477-025-01975-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Vanneste, S. & Friml, J. Auxin: a trigger for change in plant development. Cell 136, 1005–1016 (2009). · DOI
  2. Mutte, S. K. et al. Origin and evolution of the nuclear auxin response system. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33399 (2018). · DOI
  3. Kato, H. et al. Design principles of a minimal auxin response system. Nat. Plants 6, 473–482 (2020). · DOI
  4. Lavy, M. et al. Constitutive auxin response in Physcomitrella reveals complex interactions between Aux/IAA and ARF proteins. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13325 (2016). · DOI
  5. Das, S. et al. Quantitative imaging reveals the role of MpARF proteasomal degradation during gemma germination. Plant Commun. 5, 101039 (2024). · DOI
  6. de Roij, M., Borst, J. W. & Weijers, D. Protein degradation in the auxin response. Plant Cell 36, 3025–3035 (2024). · DOI
  7. Prigge, M. J. et al. Comparative mutant analyses reveal a novel mechanism of ARF regulation in land plants. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.09.566459 (2023). · DOI
  8. Hernandez-Garcia, J. et al. Evolutionary origins and functional diversification of auxin response factors. Nat. Commun. 15, 10909 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
  9. de Vries, J. & Archibald, J. M. Plant evolution: landmarks on the path to terrestrial life. New Phytol. 217, 1428–1434 (2018). · DOI
  10. de Vries, J., Stanton, A., Archibald, J. M. & Gould, S. B. Streptophyte terrestrialization in light of plastid evolution. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 467–476 (2016). · DOI
  11. Ishizaki, K. et al. Development of gateway binary vector series with four different selection markers for the liverwort marchantia polymorpha. PLoS ONE 10, e0138876 (2015). · DOI
  12. Kubota, A., Ishizaki, K., Hosaka, M. & Kohchi, T. Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha using regenerating thalli. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 77, 167–172 (2013). · DOI
  13. Kurihara, D., Mizuta, Y., Sato, Y. & Higashiyama, T. ClearSee: a rapid optical clearing reagent for whole-plant fluorescence imaging. Development 142, 4168–4179 (2015).

Metadata

Authors
de Roij, M., Hernández García, J., Das, S., Borst, J. W., & Weijers, D.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT)
Corresponding author
Weijers, Dolf
Venue
Nature Plants
Published
2025-04-11
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
717-724
ISSN
  • 2055-026X (ISSN-L)
  • 2055-0278
OpenAlex
W4409370926
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6
FWCI
8.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Plants (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0015/2022)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (OCENW.M20.031)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Keywords
auxin response, auxin response factor, protein degradation, Marchantia polymorpha, liverworts, land plant evolution
MeSH terms
Indoleacetic Acids, Plant Growth Regulators, Plant Proteins, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Marchantia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review