Cited by 71Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classification

Modeling transcriptomic age using knowledge-primed artificial neural networks

Open access
Holzscheck, Nicholas, Falckenhayn, Cassandra, Söhle, Jörn, Kristof, Boris, Siegner, Ralf, Werner, André, Schössow, Janka, Jürgens, Clemens +5 more·2021·npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease

Abstract

The development of ‘age clocks’, machine learning models predicting age from biological data, has been a major milestone in the search for reliable markers of biological age and has since become an invaluable tool in aging research. However, beyond their unquestionable utility, current clocks offer little insight into the molecular biological processes driving aging, and their inner workings often remain non-transparent. Here we propose a new type of age clock, one that couples predictivity with interpretability of the underlying biology, achieved through the incorporation of prior knowledge into the model design. The clock, an artificial neural network constructed according to well-described biological pathways, allows the prediction of age from gene expression data of skin tissue with high accuracy, while at the same time capturing and revealing aging states of the pathways driving the prediction. The model recapitulates known associations of aging gene knockdowns in simulation experiments and demonstrates its utility in deciphering the main pathways by which accelerated aging conditions such as Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome, as well as pro-longevity interventions like caloric restriction, exert their effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41514-021-00068-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Holzscheck et al. reported that their clock was associated with multiple measures of biological skin ageing and that their model responded in expected ways to known perturbations of biological age in silico.

    “They reported that their clock was associated with multiple measures of biological skin ageing and that their model responded in expected ways to known perturbations of biological age in silico.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [84]

  • Holzscheck et al. implemented an artificial neural network that restricts neuron inputs and connectivity to known biological pathways.

    “They implemented an artificial neural network that restricts neuron inputs and connectivity to known biological pathways.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [84]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 71

Authors
Holzscheck, N., Falckenhayn, C., Söhle, J., Kristof, B., Siegner, R., Werner, A., Schössow, J., Jürgens, C., Völzke, H., Wenck, H., Winnefeld, M., Grönniger, E., & Kaderali, L.
Affiliations
  • Beiersdorf (Germany) (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Holzscheck, Nicholas
  • Kaderali, Lars
Venue
npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease
Published
2021-06-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
15-15
ISSN
2056-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165645117
Cited by
71
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
biological age prediction, model interpretability, gene expression, skin, biological pathways, Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome, caloric restriction, longevity interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review