Detecting Parkinson’s disease and its cognitive phenotypes via automated semantic analyses of action stories
Open accessAbstract
Action-concept outcomes are useful targets to identify Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients and differentiate between those with and without mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI, PD-nMCI). Yet, most approaches employ burdensome examiner-dependent tasks, limiting their utility. We introduce a framework capturing action-concept markers automatically in natural speech. Patients from both subgroups and controls retold an action-laden and a non-action-laden text (AT, nAT). In each retelling, we weighed action and non-action concepts through our automated Proximity-to-Reference-Semantic-Field (P-RSF) metric, for analysis via ANCOVAs (controlling for cognitive dysfunction) and support vector machines. Patients were differentiated from controls based on AT (but not nAT) P-RSF scores. The same occurred in PD-nMCI patients. Conversely, PD-MCI patients exhibited reduced P-RSF scores for both texts. Direct discrimination between patient subgroups was not systematic, but it yielded best outcomes via AT scores. Our approach outperformed classifiers based on corpus-derived embeddings. This framework opens scalable avenues to support PD diagnosis and phenotyping.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [49]Klumpp, P., Fritsch, J. & Noeth, E. ANN-based Alzheimer’s disease classification from bag of words, In: Speech Communication; 13th ITG-Symposium, pp. 1–4. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8578051 (2018).
- [56]Schölkopf B Smola AJ Learning with Kernels. 2002 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
- Authors
- García, A. M., Escobar-Grisales, D., Vásquez Correa, J. C., Bocanegra, Y., Moreno, L., Carmona, J., & Orozco-Arroyave, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL)
- Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
- Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe (CO)
- Corresponding author
- García, Adolfo M.
- Venue
- npj Parkinson's Disease
- Published
- 2022-11-25
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163-163
- ISSN
- 2373-8057 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9700793
- OpenAlex
- W4310062613
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- npj Parkinson s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Alzheimer’s Association (GBHI ALZ UK-22-865742)
- Universidad de Antioquia (CODI PRG2020-34068)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive phenotypes, semantic analysis, natural speech, retelling, automated diagnosis, Parkinson's disease diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review