Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soundness and completeness of quantum root-mean-square errors

Open access
Ozawa, Masanao·2019·npj Quantum Information

Abstract

Defining and measuring the error of a measurement is one of the most fundamental activities in experimental science. However, quantum theory shows a peculiar difficulty in extending the classical notion of root-mean-square (rms) error to quantum measurements. A straightforward generalization based on the noise-operator was used to reformulate Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation on the accuracy of simultaneous measurements to be universally valid and made the conventional formulation testable to observe its violation. Recently, its reliability was examined based on an anomaly that the error vanishes for some inaccurate measurements, in which the meter does not commute with the measured observable. Here, we propose an improved definition for a quantum generalization of the classical rms error, which is state-dependent, operationally definable, and perfectly characterizes accurate measurements. Moreover, it is shown that the new notion maintains the previously obtained universally valid uncertainty relations and their experimental confirmations without changing their forms and interpretations, in contrast to a prevailing view that a state-dependent formulation for measurement uncertainty relation is not tenable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41534-018-0113-z

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ozawa, M. In Quantum Aspects of Optical Communications, Lecture Notes in Physics 378 (eds Bendjaballah, C., Hirota, O. & Reynaud, S.), 3–17 (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
  2. Braginsky, V. B. & Khalili, F. Y. Quantum Measurement (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 1992). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ozawa, M. Error-disturbance relations in mixed states. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3388 (2014). · arXiv
  4. von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton UP, Princeton, NJ, 1955). [Originally published: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik] (Springer, Berlin, 1932).
  5. Ozawa, M. In Quantum Information and Computation IV, Proc. SPIE 6244 (eds Donkor, E. J., Pirich, A. R. & Brandt, H. E.), 62440Q (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2006).
  6. Ozawa, M. Disproving Heisenberg’s error-disturbance relation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3540 (2013). · arXiv
  7. Raymer, M. G. Uncertainty principle for joint measurement of noncommuting variables. Am. J. Phys. 62, 986–993 (1994). · doi:10.1119/1.17657
  8. Ylinen, K. In Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, (eds Lahti, P. & Mittelstaedt, P) 691–694 (World Scientific, Singerpore, 1985).

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Ozawa, M.
Venue
npj Quantum Information
Published
2019-01-15
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2056-6387 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2805713135
Cited by
265
References
58
FWCI
14.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17K19970, 26247016)
  • IRI-NU collaboration, funding based on a research collaboration contract between the Internet Research Institute, Inc. and Nagoya University.

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soundness and completeness of quantum root-mean-square errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41534-018-0113-z
The paper
Ozawa, M. (2019). Soundness and completeness of quantum root-mean-square errors. npj Quantum Information. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-018-0113-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.