Cited by 80Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureMechanical and Optical Resonators

Scalable quantum computer with superconducting circuits in the ultrastrong coupling regime

Open access
Stassi, Roberto, Cirio, Mauro, Nori, Franco·2020·npj Quantum Information

Abstract

Abstract So far, superconducting quantum computers have certain constraints on qubit connectivity, such as nearest-neighbor couplings. To overcome this limitation, we propose a scalable architecture to simultaneously connect several pairs of distant qubits via a dispersively coupled quantum bus. The building block of the bus is composed of orthogonal coplanar waveguide resonators connected through ancillary flux qubits working in the ultrastrong coupling regime. This regime activates virtual processes that boost the effective qubit–qubit interaction, which results in quantum gates on the nanosecond timescale. The interaction is switchable and preserves the coherence of the qubits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41534-020-00294-x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For superconducting qubits, schemes to extend the connectivity exist and have been tested, but issues such as higher cross-talk have to be considered.

    “For superconducting qubits, schemes to extend the connectivity exist and have been tested, but issues such as higher cross-talk have to be considered [52,71]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stassi, R., Cirio, M., & Nori, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics (CN)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Stassi, Roberto
Venue
npj Quantum Information
Published
2020-08-06
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2056-6387 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047472059
Cited by
80
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Quantum Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Silicon Valley Community Foundation (FQXi-IAF19-06)
  • Foundational Questions Institute (Grant No. FQXi-IAF19-06, FQXi‐IAF19‐06)
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research (JPJSBP120194828)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (via the KAKENHI Grant No. JP20H00134 and the JSPS-RFBR Grant No. JPJSBP120194828, 20H00134, JPMJCR1676, JPJSBP120194828, CREST, FQXi-IAF19-06)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (CREST, JP20H00134, JPJSBP120194828, JPMJCR1676)
  • National Safety Academic Fund (U1930403)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR1676)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF- 18-1-0358, W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
Keywords
superconducting quantum computing, ultrastrong coupling, quantum bus, coplanar waveguide resonators, flux qubits, qubit connectivity, virtual processes, scalable quantum architecture, quantum gates, coherence preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review