Cited by 0Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkersvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Modi-2 a vaccine stimulating CD4 responses to homocitrullinated self epitopes as therapy for solid cancers

Open access
Al-Omari, Abdullah A., Cook, Katherine W., Symonds, Peter, Skinner, Anne, Wright, Alissa, Zhu, Yaling, Coble, Vincent L., Mohammed, Omar J. +8 more·2024·npj Vaccines

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Stresses within the tumour microenvironment can mediate post-translational modifications (PTM) of self-proteins. Homocitrullination is the conversion of lysine residues to homocitrulline which can generate neoepitopes and bypass self-tolerance. In this study a vaccine targeting homocitrullinated peptide antigens was assessed for its ability to stimulate anti-tumour immunity. Peptides that bind HLA are often hydrophobic which can lead to complications with large scale manufacture and solubility that must be considered in the design of vaccines. Here we demonstrate the use of a self-assembling nanoparticle technology (SNAPvaxTM) to co-deliver four homocitrullinated peptides and adjuvant in nanoparticles of a precise size and composition as a vaccine (“Modi-2”) that is optimized for manufacturing ease and T cell induction. The vaccine stimulated strong Th1 cell responses and anti-tumour immunity in mouse tumour models with 40% overall survival against B16 melanoma (p=0.0113), 100% survival against CT26 colorectal cancer (p<0.0001) and 70% survival against 4T1 breast cancer (p=0.0090). We demonstrate that human lung, colorectal, breast and prostate tumours express the antigens that are targets of the Modi-2 vaccine. We therefore propose the Modi-2 vaccine utilizing homocitrullinated peptides and SNAPvax has potential for translation into clinic in several cancer indications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41541-024-01029-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Al-Omari, A. A., Cook, K. W., Symonds, P., Skinner, A., Wright, A., Zhu, Y., Coble, V. L., Mohammed, O. J., Choudhury, R. H., Uddin, N., Ranglani, P., Parry, A., Adams, S. E., Lynn, G. M., Durrant, L. G., & Brentville, V. A.
Corresponding author
Durrant, Lindy G.
Venue
npj Vaccines
Published
2024-11-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
236-236
ISSN
2059-0105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404754520
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Scancell Ltd
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
cancer vaccines, nanoparticle self-assembly, CD4+ T cell responses, neoantigens, post-translational modification, tumor microenvironment, B16 melanoma, 4T1 breast cancer, antitumor immunity, tumor antigens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review