Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The framework yields testable predictions-such as primordial black-hole population and gravitational-wave backgrounds-that distinguish it observationally from both ΛCDM and other cyclic cosmologies.
“Moreover, the framework yields testable predictions—such as primordial black-hole population [20,21] and gravitational-wave backgrounds—that distinguish it observationally from both ΛCDM and other cyclic cosmologies [22].”
From Counting Cosmic Cycles: Past Big Crunches, Future Recurrence Limits, and the Age of the Quantum Memory Matrix Universe (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357 · see citing works
Self-citationBlack Holes in the Early Universe
Carr, B. J., & Hawking, S. W. (1974) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/168.2.399 · Cited by 1,827 · see citing works
New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes
Carr, B. J., Kohri, K., Sendouda, Y., & Yokoyama, J. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.104019 · Cited by 1,166 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neukart, F., Marx, E., & Vinokur, V. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27101043 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Moreover, the framework yields testable predictions—such as primordial black-hole population [20,21] and gravitational-wave backgrounds—that distinguish it observationally from both Λ CDM and other cyclic cosmologies [22].”
- Authors
- Niikura, H., Takada, M., Yasuda, N., Lupton, R. H., Sumi, T., More, S., Kurita, T., Sugiyama, S., More, A., Oguri, M., & Chiba, M.
- Affiliations
- Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (JP)
- Princeton University (US)
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Tohoku University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Niikura, Hiroko
- Takada, Masahiro
- Venue
- Nature Astronomy
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 524-534
- ISSN
- 2397-3366 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2760869647
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 36.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Astronomy (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H03654, 15H05889, 19H00677, 15H05893, 17J03653)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- primordial black holes, gravitational microlensing, dark matter, M31, Galactic halo, Hyper Suprime-Cam
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review