CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensing gastrointestinal motility

Haghiashtiani, Ghazaleh, McAlpine, Michael C.·2017·Nature Biomedical Engineering
DOI 10.1038/s41551-017-0146-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41551-017-0146-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3D printed implants can be compatible with electrode manufacturing techniques.

    “3D printed implants can be compatible with electrode manufacturing techniques (Haghiashtiani and McAlpine, 2017), opening the door for future perfect-fit epineurial cuff electrodes suitable for clinical use.”

    From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Haghiashtiani and McAlpine, 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bettinger, C. J. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 575–585 (2015). · DOI
  2. Cassilly, D. et al. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 20, 311–319 (2008). · DOI
  3. Traverso, G. et al. PLoS ONE 10, e0141666 (2015). · DOI
  4. Iddan, G., Meron, G., Glukhovsky, A. & Swain, P. Nature 405, 417 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Liao, Z., Gao, R., Xu, C. & Li, Z. S. Gastrointest. Endosc. 71, 280–286 (2010). · DOI
  6. Dagdeviren, C. et al. Nat. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0140-7 (2017). · DOI
  7. Nadeau, P. et al. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0022 (2017). · DOI
  8. Shin, K. Y., Lee, J. S. & Jang, J. Nano Energy 22, 95–104 (2016). · DOI
  9. Jeong, C. K. et al. APL Mater. 5, 074102 (2017). · DOI
  10. Guo, S. Z., Qiu, K., Meng, F., Park, S. H. & McAlpine, M. C. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701218 (2017). · DOI
  11. Kim, K. et al. ACS Nano 8, 9799–9806 (2014). · DOI
  12. Zhang, S. Y. et al. Nat. Mater. 14, 1065–1071 (2015). · DOI
  13. Gupta, M. K. et al. Nano Lett. 15, 5321–5329 (2015). · DOI
  14. Holman, D. B., Brunelle, B. W., Trachsel, J. & Allen, H. K. mSystems https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00004-17 (2017). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Haghiashtiani, G., & McAlpine, M. C.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
McAlpine, Michael C.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Biomedical Engineering
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-10-10
Volume
1
Issue
10
Pages
775-776
ISSN
2157-846X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41551-017-0146-1
OpenAlex
W2762642604
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
gastrointestinal motility, piezoelectric sensors, flexible sensors, mechanical deformation sensing, pigs, energy harvesting, implantable sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review