Cited by 241Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Identification of psychiatric disorder subtypes from functional connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography

Open access
Zhang, Yu, Wu, Wei, Toll, Russell T., Naparstek, Sharon, Maron-Katz, Adi, Watts, Mallissa, Gordon, Joseph, Jeong, Jisoo +13 more·2020·Nature Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The understanding and treatment of psychiatric disorders, which are known to be neurobiologically and clinically heterogeneous, could benefit from the data-driven identification of disease subtypes. Here, we report the identification of two clinically relevant subtypes of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) on the basis of robust and distinct functional connectivity patterns, prominently within the frontoparietal control network and the default mode network. We identified the disease subtypes by analysing, via unsupervised and supervised machine learning, the power-envelope-based connectivity of signals reconstructed from high-density resting-state electroencephalography in four datasets of patients with PTSD and MDD, and show that the subtypes are transferable across independent datasets recorded under different conditions. The subtype whose functional connectivity differed most from those of healthy controls was less responsive to psychotherapy treatment for PTSD and failed to respond to an antidepressant medication for MDD. By contrast, both subtypes responded equally well to two different forms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for MDD. Our data-driven approach may constitute a generalizable solution for connectome-based diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41551-020-00614-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 241

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Berg AO Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Assessment of The Evidence (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008).

Authors
Zhang, Y., Wu, W., Toll, R. T., Naparstek, S., Maron-Katz, A., Watts, M., Gordon, J., Jeong, J., Astolfi, L., Shpigel, E., Longwell, P., Sarhadi, K., El-Said, D., Li, Y., Cooper, C., Chin-Fatt, C., Arns, M., Goodkind, M. S., Trivedi, M. H., Marmar, C. R., & Etkin, A.
Affiliations
  • Lehigh University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • New Mexico VA Health Care System (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Alto Neuroscience (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Etkin, Amit
Venue
Nature Biomedical Engineering
Published
2020-10-19
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
309-323
ISSN
2157-846X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092775435
Cited by
241
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 2
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (DP1MH116506, U01MH092221, U01MH092250)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, functional connectivity, resting-state EEG, frontoparietal network, default mode network, power envelope, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, treatment response prediction, psychotherapy response, antidepressant response
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Brain, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cluster Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Databases, Factual, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review