The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging defects and their evolution in a metal–organic framework at sub-unit-cell resolution
Open accessAbstract
Defect engineering of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) offers promising opportunities for tailoring their properties to specific functions and applications. However, determining the structures of defects in MOFs—either point defects or extended ones—has proved challenging owing to the difficulty of directly probing local structures in these typically fragile crystals. Here we report the real-space observation, with sub-unit-cell resolution, of structural defects in the catalytic MOF UiO-66 using a combination of low-dose transmission electron microscopy and electron crystallography. Ordered ‘missing linker’ and ‘missing cluster’ defects were found to coexist. The missing-linker defects, reconstructed three-dimensionally with high precision, were attributed to terminating formate groups. The crystallization of the MOF was found to undergo an Ostwald ripening process, during which the defects also evolve: on prolonged crystallization, only the missing-linker defects remained. These observations were rationalized through density functional theory calculations. Finally, the missing-cluster defects were shown to be more catalytically active than their missing-linker counterparts for the isomerization of glucose to fructose.Structural defects are known to exist in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and to affect the materials’ properties, but their exact structures have remained difficult to determine. Now, missing-linker and missing-cluster defects have been observed in a MOF using low-dose transmission electron microscopy, enabling their distributions, evolutions during crystallization and effects on the material’s catalytic activity to be explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Horike, S., Shimomura, S., & Kitagawa, S. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.444 · Cited by 2,486
Cited by
Winarta, J., Shan, B., Mcintyre, S. M., Ye, L., Wang, C., Liu, J., & Mu, B. (2020) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00955 · Cited by 641
Insight into the design of defect electrocatalysts: From electronic structure to adsorption energy
Xie, C., Yan, D., Chen, W., Zou, Y., Chen, R., Zang, S., Wang, Y., Yao, X., & Wang, S. (2019) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.021 · Cited by 490
Xiang, W., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, C.-J., & Tu, X. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d0ta08009h · Cited by 359
Self-citationWu, Y., Li, Y., Gao, J., & Zhang, Q. (2021) · SusMat · doi:10.1002/sus2.3 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, L., Chen, Z., Wang, J., Zhang, D., Zhu, Y., Ling, S., Huang, K.-W., Belmabkhout, Y., Adil, K., Zhang, Y., Slater, B., Eddaoudi, M., & Han, Y.
- Venue
- Nature Chemistry
- Published
- 2019-05-13
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 622-628
- ISSN
- 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-4349
- OpenAlex
- W2945025851
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging defects and their evolution in a metal–organic framework at sub-unit-cell resolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41557-019-0263-4
- The paper
- Liu, L., Chen, Z., Wang, J., Zhang, D., Zhu, Y., Ling, S., Huang, K.-W., Belmabkhout, Y., Adil, K., Zhang, Y., Slater, B., Eddaoudi, M., & Han, Y. (2019). Imaging defects and their evolution in a metal–organic framework at sub-unit-cell resolution. Nature Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0263-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.