Cited by 280Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEnvironmental and biological studiesMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

A test of the hierarchical model of litter decomposition

Open access
Bradford, Mark A., Veen, G. F., Bonis, Anne, Bradford, Ella M., Classen, Aimee T., Cornelissen, J. Hans C., Crowther, Thomas. W., De Long, Jonathan R. +11 more·2017·Nature Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Our basic understanding of plant litter decomposition informs the assumptions underlying widely applied soil biogeochemical models, including those embedded in Earth system models. Confidence in projected carbon cycle-climate feedbacks therefore depends on accurate knowledge about the controls regulating the rate at which plant biomass is decomposed into products such as CO 2. Here we test underlying assumptions of the dominant conceptual model of litter decomposition. The model posits that a primary control on the rate of decomposition at regional to global scales is climate (temperature and moisture), with the controlling effects of decomposers negligible at such broad spatial scales. Using a regional-scale litter decomposition experiment at six sites spanning from northern Sweden to southern France-and capturing both within and among site variation in putative controls-we find that contrary to predictions from the hierarchical model, decomposer (microbial) biomass strongly regulates decomposition at regional scales. Furthermore, the size of the microbial biomass dictates the absolute change in decomposition rates with changing climate variables. Our findings suggest the need for revision of the hierarchical model, with decomposers acting as both local- and broad-scale controls on litter decomposition rates, necessitating their explicit consideration in global biogeochemical models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41559-017-0367-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies identified important and representative variables for litter decomposition.

    “The selection of variables is based on two main criteria: First, the conclusions proposed by previous studies (7, 19–21, 23), which identified important and representative variables; and second, the availability and reliability of data sources for these variables at global scale.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 280

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Schmitz, O. J. Resolving Ecosystem Complexity (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2010).
  2. Poorter, H. & Villar, R. in Plant Resource Allocation (eds Bazzaz, F. A. & Grace, J.) 39-72 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1997).
  3. Nature Research, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Limited ("Nature Research") Terms and Conditions Nature Research supports a reasonable amount of sharing of content by authors, subscribers and authorised or authenticated users ("Users"), for small-scale personal, non-commercial use provided that you respect and maintain all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices. By accessing, viewing or using the nature content you agree to these terms of use ("Terms"). For these purposes, Nature Research considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial. and

Authors
Bradford, M. A., Veen, G. F., Bonis, A., Bradford, E. M., Classen, A. T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Crowther, T. W., De Long, J. R., Freschet, G. T., Kardol, P., Manrubia-Freixa, M., Maynard, D. S., Newman, G. S., Logtestijn, R. S. P., Viketoft, M., Wardle, D. A., Wieder, W. R., Wood, S. A., & van der Putten, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NL)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
Corresponding author
Bradford, Mark A.
Venue
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Published
2017-11-13
Volume
1
Issue
12
Pages
1836-1845
ISSN
2397-334X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767220445
Cited by
280
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 1
FWCI
26.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1457614)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0010562)
  • Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (260-55290, 863.14.013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and biological studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
plant litter decomposition, microbial biomass, temperature and moisture effects, soil carbon cycling, carbon-climate feedback, Earth system models, biogeochemical modeling
MeSH terms
Climate, Europe, Models, Theoretical, Soil Microbiology, Climate Change, Carbon Cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review