Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination
Abstract
Solar geoengineering is receiving increased policy attention as a potential tool to offset climate warming. While climate responses to geoengineering have been studied in detail, the potential biodiversity consequences are largely unknown. To avoid extinction, species must either adapt or move to track shifting climates. Here, we assess the effects of the rapid implementation, continuation and sudden termination of geoengineering on climate velocities-the speeds and directions that species would need to move to track changes in climate. Compared to a moderate climate change scenario (RCP4.5), rapid geoengineering implementation reduces temperature velocities towards zero in terrestrial biodiversity hotspots. In contrast, sudden termination increases both ocean and land temperature velocities to unprecedented speeds (global medians >10 km yr-1) that are more than double the temperature velocities for recent and future climate change in global biodiversity hotspots. Furthermore, as climate velocities more than double in speed, rapid climate fragmentation occurs in biomes such as temperate grasslands and forests where temperature and precipitation velocity vectors diverge spatially by >90°. Rapid geoengineering termination would significantly increase the threats to biodiversity from climate change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher levels and swifter deployment of SAI would mean greater potential for disastrous impacts.
“Higher levels and swifter deployment of SAI would mean greater potential for disastrous impacts (Trisos et al., 2018; Zarnetske et al., 2021).”
From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as Trisos et al., 2018
Rapid climate alteration from implementation or abrupt cessation of stratospheric aerosol injection could pose a significant threat to biodiversity as organisms may be unable to acclimate or adapt to these sudden environmental changes.
“This could pose a significant threat to biodiversity as organisms may be unable to acclimate or adapt to these sudden environmental changes [67, 68]).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 157
- Authors
- Trisos, C. H., Amatulli, G., Gurevitch, J., Robock, A., Xia, L., & Zambri, B.
- Affiliations
- National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Trisos, Christopher H.
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2018-01-22
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 475-482
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792594403
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17
- FWCI
- 10.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Yale University
- National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- solar geoengineering, biodiversity impacts, climate change, climate velocity, rapid climate change, biodiversity hotspots, temperate grassland, forests
- MeSH terms
- Engineering, Models, Theoretical, Solar Energy, Biodiversity, Extinction, Biological, Climate Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review