Cited by 157Climate Change and GeoengineeringSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination

Trisos, Christopher H., Amatulli, Giuseppe, Gurevitch, Jessica, Robock, Alan, Xia, Lili, Zambri, Brian·2018·Nature Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Solar geoengineering is receiving increased policy attention as a potential tool to offset climate warming. While climate responses to geoengineering have been studied in detail, the potential biodiversity consequences are largely unknown. To avoid extinction, species must either adapt or move to track shifting climates. Here, we assess the effects of the rapid implementation, continuation and sudden termination of geoengineering on climate velocities-the speeds and directions that species would need to move to track changes in climate. Compared to a moderate climate change scenario (RCP4.5), rapid geoengineering implementation reduces temperature velocities towards zero in terrestrial biodiversity hotspots. In contrast, sudden termination increases both ocean and land temperature velocities to unprecedented speeds (global medians >10 km yr-1) that are more than double the temperature velocities for recent and future climate change in global biodiversity hotspots. Furthermore, as climate velocities more than double in speed, rapid climate fragmentation occurs in biomes such as temperate grasslands and forests where temperature and precipitation velocity vectors diverge spatially by >90°. Rapid geoengineering termination would significantly increase the threats to biodiversity from climate change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41559-017-0431-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 157

Authors
Trisos, C. H., Amatulli, G., Gurevitch, J., Robock, A., Xia, L., & Zambri, B.
Affiliations
  • National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Trisos, Christopher H.
Venue
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Published
2018-01-22
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
475-482
ISSN
2397-334X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792594403
Cited by
157
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17
FWCI
10.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Yale University
  • National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
solar geoengineering, biodiversity impacts, climate change, climate velocity, rapid climate change, biodiversity hotspots, temperate grassland, forests
MeSH terms
Engineering, Models, Theoretical, Solar Energy, Biodiversity, Extinction, Biological, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review