Impacts of hypoxic events surpass those of future ocean warming and acidification
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decades, three major challenges to marine life have emerged as a consequence of anthropogenic emissions: ocean warming, acidification and oxygen loss. While most experimental research has targeted the first two stressors, the last remains comparatively neglected. Here, we implemented sequential hierarchical mixed-model meta-analyses (721 control-treatment comparisons) to compare the impacts of oxygen conditions associated with the current and continuously intensifying hypoxic events (1-3.5 O 2 mg l-1) with those experimentally yielded by ocean warming (+4 °C) and acidification (-0.4 units) conditions on the basis of IPCC projections (RCP 8.5) for 2100. In contrast to warming and acidification, hypoxic events elicited consistent negative effects relative to control biological performance-survival (-33%), abundance (-65%), development (-51%), metabolism (-33%), growth (-24%) and reproduction (-39%)-across the taxonomic groups (mollusks, crustaceans and fish), ontogenetic stages and climate regions studied. Our findings call for a refocus of global change experimental studies, integrating oxygen concentration drivers as a key factor of ocean change. Given potential combined effects, multistressor designs including gradual and extreme changes are further warranted to fully disclose the future impacts of ocean oxygen loss, warming and acidification.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent meta-analysis identified hypoxic events as the only global change stressor, among warming, acidification, and oxygen loss, to consistently elicit negative effects on abundance, development, growth, metabolism, reproduction, or survival across all taxonomic groups tested.
“A recent meta-analysis identified hypoxic events as the only global change stressor (of warming, acidification, and oxygen loss) to consistently elicit negative effects on abundance, development, growth, metabolism, reproduction, or survival, across all taxonomic groups tested (Sampaio et al., 2021).”
From Warming and hypoxia reduce the performance and survival of northern bay scallops (<i>Argopecten irradians irradians</i>) amid a fishery collapse (2023) · cites this paper as Sampaio et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 194 · Cited by 295
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
- IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
- Diaz, R. et al. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 33, 246-303 (1995).
- Authors
- Sampaio, E., Santos, C., Rosa, I. C., Ferreira, V., Pörtner, H.-O., Duarte, C. M., Levin, L. A., & Rosa, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sampaio, Eduardo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2021-01-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 311-321
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3119266734
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 194
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 23
- FWCI
- 23.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (submittedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1829623)
- California HIV/AIDS Research Program
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (422037984)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA18NOS4780172)
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/MAR/04292, UID/MAR/04292/2019, CEECIND/02484/2018, SFRH/BD/131771/2017, /2017, SFRH/BD/117890/2016)
- European Social Fund
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
- Keywords
- hypoxia, ocean warming, ocean acidification, ocean deoxygenation, marine organisms, survival, growth, reproduction, Mollusca, Crustacea, fish, climate change impacts
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Oceans and Seas, Global Warming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review