Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the United States, fuel poverty is prevalent in one-third of households and has not been formally recognized by the federal government.
“In the United States, fuel poverty, despite its prevalence in one-third of households, has not been formally recognized by the federal government (7)”
From Review of the Impact of Housing Quality on Inequalities in Health and Well-Being (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 375
- Authors
- Bednar, D. J., & Reames, T. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bednar, Dominic J.
- Venue
- Nature Energy
- Published
- 2020-03-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 432-439
- ISSN
- 2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3012920309
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 13
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Energy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Keywords
- energy poverty, household welfare, fuel poverty, food insecurity, vulnerable families, United States energy policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
