Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A unified description of non-radiative voltage losses in organic solar cells

Open access
Chen, Xian-Kai, Qian, Deping, Wang, Yuming, Kirchartz, Thomas, Tress, Wolfgang, Yao, Huifeng, Yuan, Jun, Hülsbeck, Markus, Zhang, Maojie, Zou, Yingping, Sun, Yanming, Li, Yongfang, Hou, Jianhui, Inganäs, Olle, Coropceanu, Veaceslav, Bredas, Jean-Luc, Gao, Feng·2021·Nature Energy

Abstract

Recent advances in organic solar cells based on non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs) come with reduced non-radiative voltage losses (ΔVnr). Here we show that, in contrast to the energy-gap-law dependence observed in conventional donor:fullerene blends, the ΔVnr values in state-of-the-art donor:NFA organic solar cells show no correlation with the energies of charge-transfer electronic states at donor:acceptor interfaces. By combining temperature-dependent electroluminescence experiments and dynamic vibronic simulations, we provide a unified description of ΔVnr for both fullerene- and NFA-based devices. We highlight the critical role that the thermal population of local exciton states plays in low-ΔVnr systems. An important finding is that the photoluminescence yield of the pristine materials defines the lower limit of ΔVnr. We also demonstrate that the reduction in ΔVnr (for example, <0.2 V) can be obtained without sacrificing charge generation efficiency. Our work suggests designing donor and acceptor materials with high luminescence efficiency and complementary optical absorption bands extending into the near-infrared region. Organic solar cells based on non-fullerene acceptors have enabled high efficiencies yet their charge dynamics and its impact on the photovoltaic parameters are not fully understood. Now, Chen et al. provide a general description of non-radiative voltage losses in both fullerene and non-fullerene solar cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41560-021-00843-4

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X.-K., Qian, D., Wang, Y., Kirchartz, T., Tress, W., Yao, H., Yuan, J., Hülsbeck, M., Zhang, M., Zou, Y., Sun, Y., Li, Y., Hou, J., Inganäs, O., Coropceanu, V., Bredas, J.-L., & Gao, F.
Venue
Nature Energy
Published
2021-06-07
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
799-806
ISSN
2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3168655916
Cited by
444
References
40
FWCI
22.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unified description of non-radiative voltage losses in organic solar cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41560-021-00843-4
The paper
Chen, X.-K., Qian, D., Wang, Y., Kirchartz, T., Tress, W., Yao, H., Yuan, J., Hülsbeck, M., Zhang, M., Zou, Y., Sun, Y., Li, Y., Hou, J., Inganäs, O., Coropceanu, V., Bredas, J.-L., & Gao, F. (2021). A unified description of non-radiative voltage losses in organic solar cells. Nature Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00843-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.