The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critically assessing sodium-ion technology roadmaps and scenarios for techno-economic competitiveness against lithium-ion batteries
Open accessAbstract
Sodium-ion batteries are considered a promising substitute for Li-ion, but the timeline and conditions for achieving cost-competitiveness remain uncertain. This study evaluates their techno-economic potential, showing that while challenging, they could compete with low-cost Li-ion batteries by the 2030s under specific conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes
WRIGHT, T. P. (1936) · Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences · doi:10.2514/8.155 · Cited by 2,958
Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles
Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2564 · Cited by 1,819
Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition
Kittner, N., Lill, F., & Kammen, D. M. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.125 · Cited by 1,246
The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates
Schmidt, O., Hawkes, A., Gambhir, A., & Staffell, I. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.110 · Cited by 1,134
Projecting the Future Levelized Cost of Electricity Storage Technologies
Schmidt, O., Melchior, S., Hawkes, A., & Staffell, I. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.008 · Cited by 987
A non-academic perspective on the future of lithium-based batteries
Frith, J. T., Lacey, M. J., & Ulissi, U. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-35933-2 · Cited by 820
Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics
Nemet, G. F. (2006) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.020 · Cited by 767
Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition
Way, R., Ives, M. C., Mealy, P., & Farmer, J. D. (2022) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.009 · Cited by 607
Re-examining rates of lithium-ion battery technology improvement and cost decline
Ziegler, M. S., & Trancik, J. E. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02681f · Cited by 460
Re-examining rates of lithium-ion battery technology improvement and cost decline
Ziegler, M. S., & Trancik, J. E. (2020) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, A., Benson, S. M., & Chueh, W. C.
- Venue
- Nature Energy
- Published
- 2025-01-13
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 404-416
- ISSN
- 2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4406333986
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 102.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critically assessing sodium-ion technology roadmaps and scenarios for techno-economic competitiveness against lithium-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41560-024-01701-9
- The paper
- Yao, A., Benson, S. M., & Chueh, W. C. (2025). Critically assessing sodium-ion technology roadmaps and scenarios for techno-economic competitiveness against lithium-ion batteries. Nature Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01701-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.