Isotopic evidence for oxygenated Mesoarchaean shallow oceans
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fractionated iron and molybdenum isotopes and levels of redox-sensitive metals suggest marine photic zone O2 at 3.2 to 3.0 Ga ago.
“Fractionated iron and molybdenum isotopes and levels of redox-sensitive metals suggest marine photic zone O2 (96–99).”
From The Archean atmosphere (2020) · cites this paper as [96]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Eickmann, B., Hofmann, A., Wille, M., Bui, T. H., Wing, B. A., & Schoenberg, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- McGill University (CA)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eickmann, Benjamin
- Venue
- Nature Geoscience
- Published
- 2018-01-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-138
- ISSN
- 1752-0894 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-0908
- OpenAlex
- W2783053324
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Geoscience (publishedVersion)
- Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Keywords
- microbial sulfate reduction, pyrite sulfur isotopes, iron isotopes, early diagenesis, Pongola Supergroup, shallow marine environment, iron cycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review