CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,003Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology ResearchQuality of Life Measurement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in subjective well-being research

Diener, Ed, Oishi, Shigehiro, Tay, Louis·2018·Nature Human Behaviour
DOI 10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The empirical science of subjective well-being, popularly referred to as happiness or satisfaction, has grown enormously in the past decade. In this Review, we selectively highlight and summarize key researched areas that continue to develop. We describe the validity of measures and their potential biases, as well as the scientific methods used in this field. We describe some of the predictors of subjective well-being such as temperament, income and supportive social relationships. Higher subjective well-being has been associated with good health and longevity, better social relationships, work performance and creativity. At the community and societal levels, cultures differ not only in their levels of well-being but also to some extent in the types of subjective well-being they most value. Furthermore, there are both universal and unique predictors of subjective well-being in various societies. National accounts of subjective well-being to help inform policy decisions at the community and societal levels are now being considered and adopted. Finally we discuss the unknowns in the science and needed future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 134 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bruni, L. & Porta, P. L. Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY, 2007).
  2. Tay, L., Zyphur, M. J. & Batz, C. Income and subjective well-being: review, synthesis, and future research. In Handbook of Well-Being (eds Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Tay, L.) (DEF Publishers, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018).
  3. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. & Diener, E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychol. Bull. 131, 803–855 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gruber, J. & Mullainathan, S. in Happiness and Public Policy: Theory, Case Studies and Implications (eds Ng, Y.-K. & Ho, L. S.) 109–146 (Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Diener, Ed
ORCID
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-02-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
253-260
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6
OpenAlex
W2793738252
Cited by
2,003
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 441 · 2025: 408 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 304 · 2022: 216 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 16
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
subjective well-being, happiness, life satisfaction, measurement bias, temperament, income, interpersonal relationships, health and longevity, employee performance, creativity, cross-cultural comparison, policy
MeSH terms
Culture, Happiness, Humans, Personal Satisfaction, Research Design, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review