The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality research needs good working conditions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mental health concerns among early-career researchers (ECRs), including predoctoral (PhD students) and early postdoctoral researchers, have been gaining attention and point towards a potential mental health crisis in academia1–7.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“These shifts incentivize research that is safe, short-term and likely to generate high citation counts, while discouraging riskier, long-term or niche projects4,68,73,74.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“The most frequently cited systemic factor is the mismatch between the growing number of PhD graduates and the comparatively limited number of permanent positions in academia4,40,66–68.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- IJzerman, H. et al. APS Obs. 34, www.go.nature.com/3WOu0PJ (2021).
- Platt, M. O. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 783–784 (2020). · DOI
- Taris, T. W. & Schaufeli, W. B. in Current Issues in Work and Organizational Psychology (ed. Cooper, C.) 189–204 (Routledge, 2004).
- John, L. K., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. Psychol. Sci. 23, 524–532 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Desai, T. A., Eniola-Adefeso, O., Stevens, K. R., Vazquez, M. & Imoukhuede, P. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 556–559 (2021). · DOI
- Götz, F. M., Gosling, S. D. & Rentfrow, P. J. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 205–215 (2022). · DOI
- Tiokhin, L., Lakens, D., Smaldinon, P. E. & Panchanathan, K. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/juwck (2021). · DOI
- Allen, L., O’Connell, A. & Kiermer, V. Learn. Publ. 32, 71–74 (2019). · DOI
- Vazire, S. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 411–417 (2018). · DOI
- Pownall, M. et al. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. Psychol., https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000307 (2021). · DOI
- Azevedo, F. et al. BMC Res. Notes 15, 75 (2022). · DOI
- Lewis, N. A. Jr & Wai, J. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 1242–1254 (2021). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crone, E. A., & van Drunen, L. (2024) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000539844 · Cited by 17
“Some questions that arise may need small-scale discovery studies that can be conducted in single laboratories, and others require large-scale team science studies that have the potential to detect the best levels of prediction at population level (Rahal et al., 2023).”
Dreisoerner, A., Goetz, V., Frohnmayer, D., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Nater, U. M. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02505-5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahal, R.-M., Fiedler, S., Adetula, A., Berntsson, R. P.-A., Dirnagl, U., Feld, G. B., Fiebach, C. J., Himi, S. A., Horner, A. J., Lonsdorf, T. B., Schönbrodt, F., Silan, M. A. A., Wenzler, M., & Azevedo, F.
- Venue
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2023-02-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-167
- ISSN
- 2397-3374
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality research needs good working conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41562-022-01508-2
- The paper
- Rahal, R.-M., Fiedler, S., Adetula, A., Berntsson, R. P.-A., Dirnagl, U., Feld, G. B., Fiebach, C. J., Himi, S. A., Horner, A. J., Lonsdorf, T. B., Schönbrodt, F., Silan, M. A. A., Wenzler, M., & Azevedo, F. (2023). Quality research needs good working conditions. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01508-2
