The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Generative AI has a language problem
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“LLMs can mimic biases and other deficiencies from their training data (38–41) or even outright plagiarize (42).”
From Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Choudhury, M.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (India) (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Choudhury, Monojit
- ORCID
- Choudhury, Monojit
- Venue
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2023-11-20
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1802-1803
- ISSN
- 2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388834665
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- generative AI, large language models, language difficulties, emotional intelligence test, small and medium-sized enterprises
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
