Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linking void and interphase evolution to electrochemistry in solid-state batteries using operando X-ray tomography

Open access
Lewis, John A., Cortes, Francisco Javier Quintero, Liu, Yuhgene, Miers, John C., Verma, Ankit, Vishnugopi, Bairav S., Tippens, Jared, Prakash, Dhruv, Marchese, Thomas S., Han, Sang Yun, Lee, Chanhee, Shetty, Pralav P., Lee, Hyun-Wook, Shevchenko, Pavel, De Carlo, Francesco, Saldana, Christopher, Mukherjee, Partha P., McDowell, Matthew T.·2021·Nature Materials

Abstract

Despite progress in solid-state battery engineering, our understanding of the chemo-mechanical phenomena that govern electrochemical behaviour and stability at solid–solid interfaces remains limited compared to at solid–liquid interfaces. Here, we use operando synchrotron X-ray computed microtomography to investigate the evolution of lithium/solid-state electrolyte interfaces during battery cycling, revealing how the complex interplay among void formation, interphase growth and volumetric changes determines cell behaviour. Void formation during lithium stripping is directly visualized in symmetric cells, and the loss of contact that drives current constriction at the interface between lithium and the solid-state electrolyte (Li10SnP2S12) is quantified and found to be the primary cause of cell failure. The interphase is found to be redox-active upon charge, and global volume changes occur owing to partial molar volume mismatches at either electrode. These results provide insight into how chemo-mechanical phenomena can affect cell performance, thus facilitating the development of solid-state batteries. Understanding electrochemical behaviour and stability at solid–solid interfaces remains challenging. Operando synchrotron X-ray computed microtomography loss reveals that reconfiguration of interfacial contact is critical to explain cell failure during solid-state battery cycling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41563-020-00903-2

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Metadata

Authors
Lewis, J. A., Cortes, F. J. Q., Liu, Y., Miers, J. C., Verma, A., Vishnugopi, B. S., Tippens, J., Prakash, D., Marchese, T. S., Han, S. Y., Lee, C., Shetty, P. P., Lee, H.-W., Shevchenko, P., De Carlo, F., Saldana, C., Mukherjee, P. P., & McDowell, M. T.
Venue
Nature Materials
Published
2021-01-28
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
503-510
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
OpenAlex
W3125257567
Cited by
444
References
50
FWCI
19.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking void and interphase evolution to electrochemistry in solid-state batteries using operando X-ray tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41563-020-00903-2
The paper
Lewis, J. A., Cortes, F. J. Q., Liu, Y., Miers, J. C., Verma, A., Vishnugopi, B. S., Tippens, J., Prakash, D., Marchese, T. S., Han, S. Y., Lee, C., Shetty, P. P., Lee, H.-W., Shevchenko, P., De Carlo, F., Saldana, C., Mukherjee, P. P., & McDowell, M. T. (2021). Linking void and interphase evolution to electrochemistry in solid-state batteries using operando X-ray tomography. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00903-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.