The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering high-energy-density sodium battery anodes for improved cycling with superconcentrated ionic-liquid electrolytes
Open accessAbstract
Non-uniform metal deposition and dendrite formation in high-density energy storage devices reduces the efficiency, safety and life of batteries with metal anodes. Superconcentrated ionic-liquid electrolytes (for example 1:1 ionic liquid:alkali ion) coupled with anode preconditioning at more negative potentials can completely mitigate these issues, and therefore revolutionize high-density energy storage devices. However, the mechanisms by which very high salt concentration and preconditioning potential enable uniform metal deposition and prevent dendrite formation at the metal anode during cycling are poorly understood, and therefore not optimized. Here, we use atomic force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulations to unravel the influence of these factors on the interface chemistry in a sodium electrolyte, demonstrating how a molten-salt-like structure at the electrode surface results in dendrite-free metal cycling at higher rates. Such a structure will support the formation of a more favourable solid electrolyte interphase, accepted as being a critical factor in stable battery cycling. This new understanding will enable engineering of efficient anode electrodes by tuning the interfacial nanostructure via salt concentration and high-voltage preconditioning. Non-uniform metal deposition and dendrite formation reduce the efficiency, safety and life of batteries with metal anodes. The influence of these factors in a sodium electrolyte now shows how a molten-salt-like structure at the electrode surface results in dendrite-free metal cycling at higher rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In situ click chemistry generation of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors
Bhardwaj, A., Kaur, J., Wuest, M., & Wuest, F. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 · Cited by 7,448
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
The Electrostatic Screening Length in Concentrated Electrolytes Increases with Concentration
Smith, A. M., Lee, A. A., & Perkin, S. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00867 · Cited by 611
Cited by
Electroreduction of nitrogen with almost 100% current-to-ammonia efficiency
Du, H.-L., Chatti, M., Hodgetts, R. Y., Cherepanov, P. V., Nguyen, C. K., Matuszek, K., MacFarlane, D. R., & Simonov, A. N. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05108-y · Cited by 448
Self-citationDefect engineering of two-dimensional materials for advanced energy conversion and storage
Liu, F., & Fan, Z. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00931e · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Rakov, D. A., Chen, F., Ferdousi, S. A., Li, H., Pathirana, T., Simonov, A. N., Howlett, P. C., Atkin, R., & Forsyth, M.
- Venue
- Nature Materials
- Published
- 2020-05-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1096-1101
- ISSN
- 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4660
- OpenAlex
- W3021802054
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering high-energy-density sodium battery anodes for improved cycling with superconcentrated ionic-liquid electrolytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41563-020-0673-0
- The paper
- Rakov, D. A., Chen, F., Ferdousi, S. A., Li, H., Pathirana, T., Simonov, A. N., Howlett, P. C., Atkin, R., & Forsyth, M. (2020). Engineering high-energy-density sodium battery anodes for improved cycling with superconcentrated ionic-liquid electrolytes. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0673-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.