Cited by 136Liver physiology and pathologyPregnancy-related medical researchWound Healing and Treatments

Hepatic macrophages act as a central hub for relaxin-mediated alleviation of liver fibrosis

Open access
Hu, Mengying, Wang, Ying, Liu, Zhengsheng, Yu, Zhuo, Guan, Kaiyun, Liu, Mengrui, Wang, Menglin, Tan, Jun +1 more·2021·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

Relaxin is an antifibrotic peptide hormone previously assumed to directly reverse the activation of hepatic stellate cells for liver fibrosis resolution. Using nanoparticle-mediated delivery, here we show that, although relaxin gene therapy reduces liver fibrosis in vivo, in vitro treatment fails to induce quiescence of the activated hepatic stellate cells. We show that hepatic macrophages express the primary relaxin receptor, and that, on relaxin binding, they switch from the profibrogenic to the pro-resolution phenotype. The latter releases exosomes that promote the relaxin-mediated quiescence of activated hepatic stellate cells through miR-30a-5p. Building on these results, we developed lipid nanoparticles that preferentially target activated hepatic stellate cells in the fibrotic liver and encapsulate the relaxin gene and miR-30a-5p mimic. The combinatorial gene therapy achieves synergistic antifibrosis effects in models of mouse liver fibrosis. Collectively, our findings highlight the key role that macrophages play in the relaxin-primed alleviation of liver fibrosis and demonstrate a proof-of-concept approach to devise antifibrotic strategies through the complementary application of nanotechnology and basic science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41565-020-00836-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 136

Authors
Hu, M., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Yu, Z., Guan, K., Liu, M., Wang, M., Tan, J., & Huang, L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Ningbo No. 2 Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Leaf
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
466-477
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W3123007740
Cited by
136
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 7
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK100664)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (CA198999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
relaxin, liver fibrosis, hepatic macrophages, hepatic stellate cells, relaxin receptor, exosomes, miR-30a-5p, lipid nanoparticles, gene therapy, antifibrotic therapy, nanoparticle delivery, macrophage polarization
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Macrophages, Relaxin, Drug Delivery Systems, Receptors, Peptide, MicroRNAs, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice, Nanoparticles, Hepatic Stellate Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review