CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards

Extreme-ultraviolet frequency combs for precision metrology and attosecond science

Pupeza, Ioachim, Zhang, Chuankun, Högner, Maximilian, Ye, Jun·2021·Nature Photonics
DOI 10.1038/s41566-020-00741-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41566-020-00741-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 145

Authors
Pupeza, I., Zhang, C., Högner, M., & Ye, J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Pupeza, Ioachim
  • Ye, Jun
ORCID
Venue
Nature Photonics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-01-28
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
175-186
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
DOI
10.1038/s41566-020-00741-3
OpenAlex
W3127488747
Cited by
145
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
Keywords
high harmonic generation, optical frequency combs, mode-locked lasers, nuclear transitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review