Mid-infrared semimetal polarization detectors with configurable polarity transition
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bias-free current generation has been demonstrated in hybrid gold-graphene systems with symmetry-broken nanostructures of different designer in-plane spatial symmetries.
“Bias-free current generation has been demonstrated in hybrid gold-graphene systems with -broken nanostructures of different designer in-plane spatial symmetries263,264.”
From Ultrafast terahertz emission from emerging symmetry-broken materials (2023) · cites this paper as [264]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 213
- Authors
- Wei, J., Xu, C., Dong, B., Qiu, C.-W., & Lee, C.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Qiu, Cheng-Wei
- Lee, Chengkuo
- Venue
- Nature Photonics
- Published
- 2021-05-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 614-621
- ISSN
- 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-4893
- OpenAlex
- W3164614949
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF-CRP15-2015-02, NRF-CRP22-2019-0006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
- Keywords
- polarization-sensitive photodetectors, few-layer graphene, nanoantennas, polarity transitions, polarization ratio, diattenuation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
