The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While algorithms to calculate the partition function of quantum systems on quantum hardware have been proposed, [182] which is not surprising in view of the quantum simulates quantum principle introduced above, extensions of these schemes to compute classical thermal averages are still scarce.”
From Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology** (2023) · cites this paper as [182]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states
Schollwöck, U. (2011) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · Cited by 4,818
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552
Lanczos, C. (1950) · Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards · doi:10.6028/jres.045.026 · Cited by 4,356
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23879 · Cited by 2,982
Szabó, A. (1982) · Cited by 2,620
Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes
McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 · Cited by 2,329
Orús, R. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · Cited by 2,255
The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms
McClean, J. R., Romero, J., Babbush, R., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023023 · Cited by 2,227
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Haferkamp, J., Hangleiter, D., Eisert, J. & Gluza, M. Contracting projected entangled pair states is average-case hard. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.00738 (2018). · arXiv
- Brandão, F. G. & Kastoryano, M. J. Finite correlation length implies efficient preparation of quantum thermal states. Commun. Math. Phys. 365, 1–16 (2019). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 710
Jafarizadeh, A., Pollmann, F., & Gammon-Smith, A. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.043018 · Cited by 9
Towards Robust Variational Quantum Simulation of Lindblad Dynamics via Stochastic Magnus Expansion
Huang, J.-C., Li, H.-E., Wang, Y.-C., Zhang, G.-Z., Li, J., & Hu, H. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/yyln-q22s · Cited by 5
Tkachenko, N. V., Ren, H., Billings, W. M., Tomann, R., Whaley, K. B., & Head‐Gordon, M. (2025) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d5sc03585f · Cited by 4
Efficient Quantum Gibbs Sampling with Local Circuits
Hahn, D., Sweke, R., Deshpande, A., & Shtanko, O. (2026) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/m5zb-z4nn · Cited by 12
Effect of thermal noise on the nonclassicality of SU(1, 1) and SU(2) coherent states
Zehtabzadeh, F., Faghihi, M. J., & Baghshahi, H. R. (2021) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01443-7 · Cited by 3
Variational microcanonical estimator
Pollock, K., Orth, P. P., & Iadecola, T. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.033224 · Cited by 3
Quantum Computing Algorithms for Nonlinear Optimization Problems
Vishwakarma, V. K. (2023) · Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis · doi:10.52783/cana.v30.279 · Cited by 3
Cai, J., Shu, Y.-R., Rao, X.-Q., & Yin, S. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.184303 · Cited by 3
Preparing quantum statistical ensembles using mid-circuit measurements
Stenger, J., Hellberg, C. S., & Gunlycke, D. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04412-y · Cited by 3
Many-body eigenstates from quantum manifold optimization
Smart, S. E., & Narang, P. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.052430 · Cited by 3
Weighted Feedback-Based Quantum Algorithm for Excited States Calculation
Rahman, S. A., Karabacak, Ö., & Wiśniewski, R. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce60285.2024.00029 · Cited by 5
Slow approach to adiabaticity in many-body non-Hermitian systems: The Hatano-Nelson model
Dupays, L., del Campo, A., & Dóra, B. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.045130 · Cited by 3
Huang, X., Kosugi, T., Nishi, H., & Matsushita, Y. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04697-7 · Cited by 3
Quantum computing of chirality imbalance in SU(2) gauge theory
Zhang, G., Guo, X., Wang, E., & Xing, H. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.056031 · Cited by 3
Nirmal, M. R., Khandelwal, A., Nambiar, M. K., & Yamijala, S. S. R. K. C. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5c04605 · Cited by 5
Goings, J. J., Shin, K., Noh, S., Kyoung, W., Kim, D., Baek, J., Roetteler, M., Epifanovsky, E., & Zhao, L. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01351 · Cited by 3
Gushanskiy, S. M., Potapov, V., & Madrigal, O. C. (2020) · Cybernetics and Information Technologies · doi:10.2478/cait-2020-0017 · Cited by 3
Evaluating thermal expectation values by almost ideal sampling with Trotter gates
Goto, S., Kaneko, R., & Danshita, I. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.024307 · Cited by 3
Wen, J., Zheng, C., Huang, Z., & Qian, L. (2023) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/acc052 · Cited by 3
Marécat, Q., Senjean, B., & Saubanère, M. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.155110 · Cited by 6
Variational post-selection for ground states and thermal states simulation
Zhang, S., Miao, J., & Hsieh, C. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad8fca · Cited by 3
Liu, Y., He, M.-Q., & Wang, Z. D. (2025) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130766 · Cited by 6
Quantum restricted Boltzmann machine is universal for quantum computationPreprint
Wu, Y., Wei, C., Qin, S.-J., Wen, Q., & Gao, F. (2020) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-69480/v1 · Cited by 4
Administration, U. A. S. F. H. R. A., Alexeev, Y., USDOE Office of Science (SC), Eidenbenz, S., Mezzacapo, A., & Pakin, S. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.2172/2280557 · Cited by 3
Research on Optimization of Hierarchical Quantum Circuit Scheduling Strategy
Han, Z., Li, H., Lu, K., Liu, S., & Ju, M. (2025) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.059577 · Cited by 3
Bai, X., Xu, T., Li, J., Liu, Y.-K., Zhao, Y., & Zhao, J. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.013332 · Cited by 3
Bayesian phase difference estimation based on single-photon projective measurement
余, X.-H. 旭. Y., 韦, Y. 颖. W., 杨, R. 然. Y., 宋, W.-H. 文. S., 缪, Y. 应. M., 周, W. 唯. Z., 李, X. 新. L., 高, X. 小. G., Gong, Y.-X., & 祝, S.-N. 世. Z. (2025) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/adde33 · Cited by 2
Tangent Space Excitation Ansatz for Quantum Circuits
Chen, J.-Y., Huang, B., Zhou, D. L., Schuch, N., Cao, C., & Yang, M. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/k2lc-v1hn · Cited by 3
Quantum Advantage in Computational Chemistry?
Gundlach, H., Sharkey, K. L., Lynch, J., Hazoglou, V., Hsu, K.-C., Dukatz, C., Crane, E., Walczyk, K., Bodziak, M., Galatsanos-Dueck, J., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce65121.2025.00249 · Cited by 6
Liu, Y.-G., Fan, H., & Chen, S. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/q33r-j5tl · Cited by 4
Iryanti, I., Hue, J. H., Soesanto, Q. M. B., Hanna, M. Y., Rangkuti, C. N., Kwek, L. C., & Sarwono, Y. P. (2025) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae2da6 · Cited by 2
Scattering phase shift in quantum mechanics on quantum computers
Guo, P., LeVan, P., Lee, F. X., & Zhao, Y. (2026) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/ds7x-7bkp · Cited by 2
A Technical Review of Quantum Computing Use Cases for Finance and Economics
Hlatshwayo, M. Q., Babel, M., Islas-Sanchez, D., & Γεωργόπουλος, Κ. (2026) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum8010026 · Cited by 3
Recovery of a generic local Hamiltonian from a degenerate steady state
Zhou, J., & Zhou, D. L. (2023) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2023.129279 · Cited by 2
Quantum simulation of water-molecule bond angles using an NMR quantum computer
Xu, F., Yang, F., Wei, C., Chen, X., Wei, S., Wang, H., Li, J., & Xin, T. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042618 · Cited by 2
U(1) fields from qubits: An approach via D-theory algebra
Berenstein, D. E., Kawai, H., & Brower, R. C. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.014506 · Cited by 2
Non-Unitary Trotter Circuits for Imaginary Time Evolution
Leadbeater, C., Fitzpatrick, N., Ramo, D. M., & Thom, A. J. W. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce60285.2024.10374 · Cited by 2
Classical optimization with imaginary-time block encoding on quantum computers: The MaxCut problem
Zhong, D., Francis, A., & Rrapaj, E. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/gtq3-j37b · Cited by 2
Lee, X., & Lau, H. C. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce65121.2025.00213 · Cited by 2
QuaSiMo: A composable library to program hybrid workflows for quantum simulation
Nguyen, T., Oftelie, L. B., Lotshaw, P. C., Lyakh, D. I., McCaskey, A., Leyton‐Ortega, V., Pooser, R. C., Elwasif, W. R., Humble, T. S., & de Jong, W. A. (2021) · IET Quantum Communication · doi:10.1049/qtc2.12024 · Cited by 2
Orbital expansion variational quantum eigensolver
Wu, Y., Huang, Z., Sun, J., Yuan, X., Wang, J. B., & Lv, D. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acf9c7 · Cited by 2
Excited-state downfolding using ground-state formalisms
Bauman, N. P. (2024) · Electronic Structure · doi:10.1088/2516-1075/ad46b6 · Cited by 2
HamPerf: A Hamiltonian-Oriented Approach to Quantum Benchmarking
Butko, A., Klymko, K., Camps, D., & Sawaya, N. P. D. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers: Workshops and Special Sessions (CF Companion) · doi:10.1145/3637543.3653431 · Cited by 3
Gibbs state sampling via cluster expansions
Eassa, N. M., Moustafa, M. M., Banerjee, A., & Cohn, J. F. (2024) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00887-w · Cited by 2
Characterization and thermometry of dissipatively stabilized steady states
Grattan, G., Liguori-Schremp, A. M., Perez, D. R., Kapit, E., Jones, W., & Graf, P. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad9e2d · Cited by 2
Quantum Zeno Monte Carlo for computing observables
Han, M., Park, H., & Choi, S. (2025) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01002-3 · Cited by 2
Engineering Si-Qubit MOSFET: Quantum-Electrostatic Integration at Cryogenic Temperatures
Pandey, N., Basu, D., Chauhan, Y. S., Register, L. F., & Banerjee, S. K. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · doi:10.1109/ted.2025.3570285 · Cited by 2
Gresch, A., Tepe, U., & Kliesch, M. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00370 · Cited by 3
Quantum imaginary-time evolution with polynomial resources in evolution time
Zhang, L., Lai, J., Wu, X., & Wang, X. (2026) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae7b7f · Cited by 2
Hahn, D., Parameswaran, S. A., & Placke, B. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/b6mc-w34s · Cited by 20
Langkabel, F., Krause, P., & Bande, A. (2023) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1696 · Cited by 2
Application of the Variational Quantum Eigensolver to the Ultimate Pit Problem
Hindy, Y., Pointing, J., Tolunay, M., Venkatarao, S., Motta, M., & Latone, J. A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00083 · Cited by 2
Self-citationSample complexity of matrix product states at finite temperature
Iwaki, A., & Hotta, C. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.224410 · Cited by 2
Machine-learning-inspired quantum control in many-body dynamics
Mao, M.-Y., Cheng, Z., Li, L., Wu, N., & You, W. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042428 · Cited by 2
Practical limitations of quantum data propagation on noisy quantum processors
Saxena, G., Shalabi, A., & Kyaw, T. H. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.054014 · Cited by 3
High-precision and low-depth quantum algorithm design for eigenstate problems
Sun, J., Zeng, P., Gur, T., & Kim, M. S. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb1622 · Cited by 10
Shadow-based quantum subspace algorithm for the nuclear shell model
Yang, R., Wang, T., Lu, B.-N., Li, Y., & Xu, X. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.012620 · Cited by 5
Developing electron dynamics into a tool for 21st century chemistry simulations
Bande, A. (2022) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781839169342-00091 · Cited by 2
Powers, C., Davoudi, Z., & Mueller, N. (2023) · International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE) · doi:10.22323/1.430.0029 · Cited by 2
NISQ algorithm for the matrix elements of a generic observable
Erbanni, R., Bharti, K., Kwek, L. C., & Poletti, D. (2023) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.15.4.180 · Cited by 2
Guzman, E. A. R., & Denis Lacroix, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13080 · Cited by 3
Variational determination of penalty parameters in quantum annealing
Qin, J.-Q., Yunlong, Y., & Wang, X. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae30a2 · Cited by 1
Imaginary-Time Quantum Relaxation Critical Dynamics with Semi-Ordered Initial States
Li, Z., Yin, S., & Shu, Y.-R. (2023) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/40/3/037501 · Cited by 1
Clemente, G. (2024) · International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE) · doi:10.22323/1.453.0216 · Cited by 2
Dynamic thermalization on noisy quantum hardware
Perrin, H., Scoquart, T., Pavlov, A. I., & Gnezdilov, N. V. (2025) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02011-6 · Cited by 1
Cheaper and more noise-resilient quantum state preparation using eigenvector continuation
Agrawal, A. A., Getelina, J. C., Francis, A., & Kemper, A. F. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.032607 · Cited by 1
Unraveling the rodeo algorithm through the Zeeman model
Gomes, R. F. I., Rocha, J. C. S., Nogueira, W. A. T., & Dias, R. A. (2025) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/add58c · Cited by 4
Open-quantum-system simulation through exploiting noise on quantum computers
Rose, M., Kais, S., & Mazziotti, D. A. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.052612 · Cited by 1
A quantum constraint generation framework for binary linear programs
Czégel, A., & G.-Tóth, B. (2025) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00364-z · Cited by 1
Quantum Information Processing
Natarajan, V. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5051-4_1 · Cited by 1
Benchmarking quantum simulation of chemical Hamiltonians using the sorted-list encoding
Ku, C., Chen, Y., Hu, A., & Hsieh, M.-H. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/6q7b-h9db · Cited by 5
Role of Riemannian Geometry in Double-Bracket Quantum Imaginary-Time Evolution
Zander, R., Seidel, R., Xiaoyue, L., & Gluza, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03924-8_11 · Cited by 1
Quasi-optimal Sampling from Gibbs States via Non-commutative Optimal Transport Metrics
Capel, Á., Gondolf, P., Kochanowski, J., & Rouzé, C. (2025) · Annales Henri Poincaré · doi:10.1007/s00023-025-01637-0 · Cited by 14
Ejima, S., Seki, K., Fauseweh, B., & Yunoki, S. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/2s2p-kvcx · Cited by 5
Páez-Velasco, P., Schilling, N., Scalet, S. O., Verstraete, F., & Capel, Á. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/sbxq-sqvp · Cited by 8
Stochastic Schrödinger equations for quantum reverse diffusion
Gabbassov, E. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/f7fd-2rb9 · Cited by 4
An Adaptive Weighted Qite-Vqe Algorithm for Combinatorial Optimization Problems
Xie, N., Lee, X., Chen, T., Saito, Y., Asai, N., & Cail, D. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce65121.2025.00032 · Cited by 1
Random State Approach to Quantum Computation of Electronic-Structure Properties
Bai, Y., Xiong, F., & Kuang, X. (2025) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/43/1/010604 · Cited by 2
Chai, Y., Jansen, K., Kühn, S., Schwägerl, T., & Stollenwerk, T. (2025) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00452-0 · Cited by 2
Deterministic Quantum Trajectory via Imaginary Time Evolution
Mittal, S., & Yan, B. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/fgkg-n2b9 · Cited by 1
Quantum state readout via overlap-based feature extraction
Nishi, H., Kosugi, T., Huang, X., Hirose, S., Okayama, T., & Yuichiro, M. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/3l9h-c367 · Cited by 3
Nature Is Stingy: Universality of Scrooge Ensembles in Quantum Many-Body Systems
Mok, W., Haug, T., Ho, W. W., & Preskill, J. P. (2026) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/tb52-jxmx · Cited by 28
Velocity Verlet-based optimization for variational quantum eigensolvers
Miura, R. (2026) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-026-05068-6 · Cited by 2
Mapping Bloch-Redfield dynamics into a unitary gate-based quantum algorithm
Aydoğan, K., Abbasi, M., Short, W., Fahrenbruch, M. Z., Krogmeier, T. J., Schlimgen, A. W., & Head-Marsden, K. (2026) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d5dd00405e · Cited by 1
Learning parameterized quantum circuits with quantum gradient
Li, K., Wang, Y., Gao, P., & Zheng, S. (2026) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01179-7 · Cited by 1
Krylov polynomials and quantum query complexity
Adhikari, K. (2026) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2026.131601 · Cited by 8
Mapping of fermionic lattice models for Ising solvers
Nagpal, L., Kumar, A., & Hassan, S. R. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-44886-7 · Cited by 1
Sekiyama, M., & Nagano, L. (2026) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/k43t-x4p2 · Cited by 1
Jędrzejewski, M., Kinastowski, K., & Roszak, K. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.062419 · Cited by 1
The Future of High Performance Computing in Biomimetics and Some Challenges
Fernandes, L. P., Kharate, P., & Singh, B. K. (2024) · Series in bioengineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1017-1_15 · Cited by 1
Counting the Ground State Degeneracy by Evolution Methods
Zhen, G., & Li, Y. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/38gb-h7wv · Cited by 1
Realizing nontrivial doublon formation using a quantum computer
Paul, B., & Mishra, T. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.l020302 · Cited by 1
Kuang, J., Bai, X., Du, W., & Li, T. (2024) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107935 · Cited by 1
OnionVQE optimization strategy for ground state preparation on NISQ devices
Gratsea, A., Selisko, J., Amsler, M., Wever, C., Eckl, T., & Samsonidze, G. G. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad8a85 · Cited by 1
General Framework for Error Interference in Quantum Simulation
Chen, B., Xu, J., Yuan, X., & Zhao, Q. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/g2n5-qdxh · Cited by 1
Robust preparation of ground state phases under noisy imaginary time evolution
Khindanov, A., Yao, Y., & Iadecola, T. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.013263 · Cited by 2
Özgüler, A. B. (2026) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/mr76-1wtz · Cited by 2
Method of Modeling Quantum Computations Using a Hardware Accelerator
Gushanskiy, S. M., Potapov, V., & Николаевич, П. В. (2020) · International Russian Automation Conference (RusAutoCon) · doi:10.1109/rusautocon49822.2020.9208110 · Cited by 1
Combinatorial optimization with variational approaches on noisy quantum devices
Miki, T., Okita, R., Shimada, M., & Shirakashi, J. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Manipulation, Manufacturing and Measurement on the Nanoscale (3M-NANO) · doi:10.1109/3m-nano49087.2021.9599740 · Cited by 1
Simulation and randomized measurement of topological phase on a trapped-ion quantum computer
Ahn, C.-E., & Cho, G. Y. (2022) · Journal of the Korean Physical Society · doi:10.1007/s40042-022-00536-5 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Motta, M., Sun, C., Tan, A. T. K., O’Rourke, M. J., Ye, E., Minnich, A. J., Brandão, F. G. S. L., & Chan, G. K.-L.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2019-11-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-210
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W2984279929
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 143 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 24.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (RAISE-TAQS CCF 1839204, DEG-1745301)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE- SC0019374)
- U.S. Department of Defense (MURI FA9550-18-1-0095)
- Erika Ye was supported by a Google fellowship.
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum imaginary time evolution, ground state, excited states, thermal states, Gibbs measures, Hamiltonian eigenstates, quantum simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review