Targeting transcription factors in cancer — from undruggable to reality
Open accessAbstract
Mutated or dysregulated transcription factors represent a unique class of drug targets that mediate aberrant gene expression, including blockade of differentiation and cell death gene expression programmes, hallmark properties of cancers. Transcription factor activity is altered in numerous cancer types via various direct mechanisms including chromosomal translocations, gene amplification or deletion, point mutations and alteration of expression, as well as indirectly through non-coding DNA mutations that affect transcription factor binding. Multiple approaches to target transcription factor activity have been demonstrated, preclinically and, in some cases, clinically, including inhibition of transcription factor-cofactor protein-protein interactions, inhibition of transcription factor-DNA binding and modulation of levels of transcription factor activity by altering levels of ubiquitylation and subsequent proteasome degradation or by inhibition of regulators of transcription factor expression. In addition, several new approaches to targeting transcription factors have recently emerged including modulation of auto-inhibition, proteolysis targeting chimaeras (PROTACs), use of cysteine reactive inhibitors, targeting intrinsically disordered regions of transcription factors and combinations of transcription factor inhibitors with kinase inhibitors to block the development of resistance. These innovations in drug development hold great promise to yield agents with unique properties that are likely to impact future cancer treatment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent advancements in drug discovery, such as novel chemical libraries and protein engineering techniques, are paving the way for overcoming obstacles to targeting transcription factors.
“However, recent advancements in drug discovery, such as the development of novel chemical libraries and protein engineering techniques, are paving the way for overcoming these obstacles [15, 17, 18].”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
The Abstract and Future directions sections describe substantial progress and new approaches for targeting transcription factors, supporting the broad claim that drug-development advances are helping overcome earlier obstacles. The passages do not identify novel chemical libraries or protein engineering techniques as the advances responsible; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTranscription factors have historically been viewed as 'undruggable'.
“Transcription factors (TFs) have historically been viewed to be “undruggable” (Bushweller, 2019), with a number of attempts giving mixed results (Grembecka et al, 2007; Masso-Valles and Soucek, 2020; Rego et al, 2000; Verhoeven et al, 2020).”
From Targeting transcription factors through an IMiD independent zinc finger domain (2025) · cites this paper as Bushweller, 2019
Transcription factors, intrinsically disordered proteins, and scaffolding proteins are among the compelling targets outside the reach of small-molecule discovery approaches.
“This includes, among others, transcription factors or other intrinsically disordered proteins, as well as scaffolding proteins.4,5”
From Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 210 · Cited by 919
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- [207]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03287245 (2017). 28792816
- [208]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02670044 (2016). 28792816
- [209]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03135262 (2017). 28792816
- [210]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03566485 (2018). 28792816
- [211]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03850535 (2019). 28792816
- [212]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02890069 (2016). 28792816
- [213]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02780128 (2016). 28792816
- [214]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02601378 (2016). 28792816
- [215]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03888612 (2019). 28792816
- [216]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03134638 (2019). 28792816
- [217]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02959437 (2016). 28792816
- [218]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02711137 (2016). 28792816
- [219]US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419417 (2015). 28792816
- Authors
- Bushweller, J. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bushweller, John H.
- ORCID
- Bushweller, John H.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Cancer
- Published
- 2019-09-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 611-624
- ISSN
- 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1768
- PMC
- PMC8820243
- OpenAlex
- W2973216672
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 210
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 162 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 143 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Virginia
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA234478, R01CA140398)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Keywords
- transcription factors, cancer drug targets, transcription factor inhibitors, protein-protein interaction inhibitors, PROTACs, intrinsically disordered regions, kinase inhibitor combination, drug resistance, chromosomal translocation, non-coding mutations
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, DNA, Humans, Ligands, Mutation, Neoplasms, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Transcription Factors, Drug Design, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Catalytic Domain, Protein Interaction Mapping, Cell Line, Tumor, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Cell Proliferation, Ubiquitination, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review