Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 254 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeting CDK4 and CDK6 in cancer

Open access
Goel, Shom, Bergholz, Johann S., Zhao, Jean J.·2022·Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK6 are critical mediators of cellular transition into S phase and are important for the initiation, growth and survival of many cancer types. Pharmacological inhibitors of CDK4/6 have rapidly become a new standard of care for patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. As expected, CDK4/6 inhibitors arrest sensitive tumour cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. However, the effects of CDK4/6 inhibition are far more wide-reaching. New insights into their mechanisms of action have triggered identification of new therapeutic opportunities, including the development of novel combination regimens, expanded application to a broader range of cancers and use as supportive care to ameliorate the toxic effects of other therapies. Exploring these new opportunities in the clinic is an urgent priority, which in many cases has not been adequately addressed. Here, we provide a framework for conceptualizing the activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors in cancer and explain how this framework might shape the future clinical development of these agents. We also discuss the biological underpinnings of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance, an increasingly common challenge in clinical oncology. Dysregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK6, regulators of the cell cycle, favours the growth and survival of several cancer types. Owing to this, CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors were developed and are currently approved for the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. This Review describes how we are only now beginning to fully understand their mechanisms of action and provides a new framework for conceptualizing their activity, which might enable expansion of the clinical opportunities of these agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41568-022-00456-3

Cites

254 of 254 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 254 references

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Goel, S., Bergholz, J. S., & Zhao, J. J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2022-03-18
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
356-372
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W4220955524
Cited by
531
References
254
FWCI
27.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeting CDK4 and CDK6 in cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41568-022-00456-3
The paper
Goel, S., Bergholz, J. S., & Zhao, J. J. (2022). Targeting CDK4 and CDK6 in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-022-00456-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.