Epithelial and stromal co-evolution and complicity in pancreatic cancer
Open accessAbstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are distinguished by their robust desmoplasia, or fibroinflammatory response. Dominated by non-malignant cells, the mutated epithelium must therefore combat, cooperate with or co-opt the surrounding cells and signalling processes in its microenvironment. It is proposed that an invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma represents the coordinated evolution of malignant and non-malignant cells and mechanisms that subvert and repurpose normal tissue composition, architecture and physiology to foster tumorigenesis. The complex kinetics and stepwise development of pancreatic cancer suggests that it is governed by a discrete set of organizing rules and principles, and repeated attempts to target specific components within the microenvironment reveal self-regulating mechanisms of resistance. The histopathological and genetic progression models of the transforming ductal epithelium must therefore be considered together with a programme of stromal progression to create a comprehensive picture of pancreatic cancer evolution. Understanding the underlying organizational logic of the tumour to anticipate and pre-empt the almost inevitable compensatory mechanisms will be essential to eradicate the disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sonic hedgehog inhibition to inactivate CAFs failed in patients, and later preclinical studies identified explanations for that failure.
“Subsequently, attempts to inactivate CAFs through sonic hedgehog inhibition proved ineffective in patients289, and preclinical studies that were conducted after the fact pinpointed reasons for this failure159,290.”
From Pancreatic cancer: Advances and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [290]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 221 · Cited by 108
- Authors
- Hingorani, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hingorani, Sunil R.
- ORCID
- Hingorani, Sunil R.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Cancer
- Published
- 2022-11-29
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 57-77
- ISSN
- 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1768
- PMC
- PMC10470605
- OpenAlex
- W4310461036
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 221
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Pancreatic Cancer Action Network
- National Institutes of Health (CA015704)
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA224193, CA015704, CA224193, CA161112, R01CA223483, R01CA161112, P30CA015704)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Keywords
- pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, tumor microenvironment, desmoplasia, tumor stroma, tumor progression, tumor evolution, treatment resistance, tumor invasion, therapeutic vulnerabilities
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Pancreas, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Stromal Cells, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Complicity, Tumor Microenvironment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review