Cited by 207Graphene research and applicationsCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

Controlling the optical properties of carbon nanotubes with organic colour-centre quantum defects

Open access
Brozena, Alexandra H., Kim, Mijin, Powell, Lyndsey R., Wang, YuHuang·2019·Nature Reviews Chemistry

Abstract

Previously unwelcome, defects are emerging as a new frontier of research, providing a molecular focal point to study the coupling of electrons, excitons, phonons and spin in low-dimensional materials. This opportunity is particularly intriguing in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes, in which covalently bonding organic functional groups to the sp 2 carbon lattice can produce tunable sp 3 quantum defects that fluoresce brightly in the shortwave IR, emitting pure single photons at room temperature. These novel physical properties have made such synthetic defects, or 'organic colour centres', exciting new systems for chemistry, physics, materials science, engineering and quantum technologies. This Review examines progress in this emerging field and presents a unified description of this new family of quantum emitters, as well as providing an outlook of the rapidly expanding research and applications of synthetic defects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41570-019-0103-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 165 · Cited by 207

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [83]Collins PG in Oxford Handbook of Nanoscience & Technology (eds Narlikar AV & Fu YY) 31– 93 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

Authors
Brozena, A. H., Kim, M., Powell, L. R., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, YuHuang
Venue
Nature Reviews Chemistry
Published
2019-06-03
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
375-392
ISSN
2397-3358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948534505
Cited by
207
References
165
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114167)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Keywords
single-walled carbon nanotubes, quantum emitters, two-level system, single-photon emission, defect engineering, exciton-phonon coupling, spin control, room-temperature single-photon sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review