Cited by 351Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismCancer and biochemical researchInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis

The multiple roles of LDH in cancer

Claps, Giuseppina, Faouzi, Sara, Quidville, Virginie, Chehade, Feras, Shen, Shensi, Vagner, Stéphan, Robert, Caroline·2022·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

High serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are typically associated with a poor prognosis in many cancer types. Even the most effective drugs, which have radically improved outcomes in patients with melanoma over the past decade, provide only marginal benefit to those with high serum LDH levels. When viewed separately from the oncological, biochemical, biological and immunological perspectives, serum LDH is often interpreted in very different ways. Oncologists usually see high serum LDH only as a robust biomarker of a poor prognosis, and biochemists are aware of the complexity of the various LDH isoforms and of their key roles in cancer metabolism, whereas LDH is typically considered to be oncogenic and/or immunosuppressive by cancer biologists and immunologists. Integrating these various viewpoints shows that the regulation of the five LDH isoforms, and their enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions is closely related to key oncological processes. In this Review, we highlight that serum LDH is far more than a simple indicator of tumour burden; it is a complex biomarker associated with the activation of several oncogenic signalling pathways as well as with the metabolic activity, invasiveness and immunogenicity of many tumours, and constitutes an extremely attractive target for cancer therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-022-00686-2

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claps, G., Faouzi, S., Quidville, V., Chehade, F., Shen, S., Vagner, S., & Robert, C.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Robert, Caroline
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2022-10-07
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
749-762
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W4303446545
Cited by
351
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer and biochemical research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Keywords
lactate dehydrogenase, serum lactate dehydrogenase, cancer prognosis, cancer metabolism, tumor immunosuppression, tumor immunogenicity, oncogenic signalling pathways, tumour invasiveness, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Humans, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Melanoma, Prognosis, Tumor Burden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review