Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far

Open access
Cappell, Kathryn M., Kochenderfer, James N.·2023·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) are engineered fusion proteins designed to target T cells to antigens expressed on cancer cells. CAR T cells are now an established treatment for patients with relapsed and/or refractory B cell lymphomas, B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and multiple myeloma. At the time of this writing, over a decade of follow-up data are available from the initial patients who received CD19-targeted CAR T cells for B cell malignancies. Data on the outcomes of patients who received B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR T cells for multiple myeloma are more limited owing to the more recent development of these constructs. In this Review, we summarize long-term follow-up data on efficacy and toxicities from patients treated with CAR T cells targeting CD19 or BCMA. Overall, the data demonstrate that CD19-targeted CAR T cells can induce prolonged remissions in patients with B cell malignancies, often with minimal long-term toxicities, and are probably curative for a subset of patients. By contrast, remissions induced by BCMA-targeted CAR T cells are typically more short-lived but also generally have only limited long-term toxicities. We discuss factors associated with long-term remissions, including the depth of initial response, malignancy characteristics predictive of response, peak circulating CAR levels and the role of lymphodepleting chemotherapy. We also discuss ongoing investigational strategies designed to improve the length of remission following CAR T cell therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have dramatically improved the outcomes of patients with certain relapsed and/or refractory haematological malignancies. Owing to the promising short-term survival outcomes achieved, long-term data on both safety and survival are becoming increasingly relevant. In this Review, the authors describe the available long-term follow-up data from early studies testing the safety and efficacy of receiving CAR T cells targeting CD19 as well as more recent data on BCMA-targeted CAR T cells in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Among haematological malignancies, the indications for use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are rapidly expanding. CD19-targeted CAR T cells are now approved for relapsed and/or refractory B cell lymphoma and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and B cell maturation antigen-targeted CAR T cells are approved for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Long-term follow-up data indicate that CD19-targeted CAR T cells are likely to be curative for a subset of patients with B cell lymphomas. These CAR T cells might need to be combined with consolidative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation to enable long-term remissions for patients with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. B cell maturation antigen-targeted CAR T cells can induce prolonged remissions in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, although whether any of these responses are curative remains unclear. Factors associated with durable remission after CAR T cell therapy include a deep initial response, lower baseline tumour volume, an absence of extramedullary disease, higher peak circulating CAR T cell levels and receipt of lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The most prominent long-term toxicities after CAR T cell therapy include cytopenias and hypogammaglobulinaemia. The incidence of severe infections >1 month after CAR T cell therapy is low compared to infections seen in the acute period immediately after cell infusion. Ongoing research efforts are attempting to improve the durability of responses after CAR T cell therapy, for example, through improved patient selection, novel CAR designs, including those targeting multiple antigens, and modifications to the manufacturing process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-023-00754-1

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 150 references

Cited by

See all 1,382

Metadata

Authors
Cappell, K. M., & Kochenderfer, J. N.
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2023-04-13
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
359-371
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W4365479582
Cited by
1,382
References
150
FWCI
66.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41571-023-00754-1
The paper
Cappell, K. M., & Kochenderfer, J. N. (2023). Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-023-00754-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.