Cited by 136Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

BRAF — a tumour-agnostic drug target with lineage-specific dependencies

Open access
Hanrahan, Aphrothiti J., Chen, Ziyu, Rosen, Neal, Solit, David B.·2024·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

In June 2022, the FDA granted Accelerated Approval to the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib for the treatment of adult and paediatric patients (≥6 years of age) with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E-mutant solid tumours, except for BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancers. The histology-agnostic approval of dabrafenib plus trametinib marks the culmination of two decades of research into the landscape of BRAF mutations in human cancers, the biochemical mechanisms underlying BRAF-mediated tumorigenesis, and the clinical development of selective RAF and MEK inhibitors. Although the majority of patients with BRAF V600E-mutant tumours derive clinical benefit from BRAF inhibitor-based combinations, resistance to treatment develops in most. In this Review, we describe the biochemical basis for oncogenic BRAF-induced activation of MAPK signalling and pan-cancer and lineage-specific mechanisms of intrinsic, adaptive and acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors. We also discuss novel RAF inhibitors and drug combinations designed to delay the emergence of treatment resistance and/or expand the population of patients with BRAF-mutant cancers who benefit from molecularly targeted therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-023-00852-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BRAF inhibitors have proven ineffective as single agents due to adaptive feedback re-activation of the MAPK and other signaling pathways.

    “BRAF inhibitors have proven ineffective as single agents due to adaptive feedback re-activation of the MAPK and other signaling pathways [5–13, 38].”

    From Co-targeting SRC overcomes resistance to BRAF inhibitors in colorectal cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The section on adaptive reprogramming says RAF inhibition can relieve negative feedback, reactivating RTKs, RAS and ERK; it also describes resistance involving other pathways. But the section on tumour-agnostic authorization reports a 50–60% response rate to vemurafenib in BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma, with most responders developing resistance within a year. Thus, resistance limits single-agent treatment, but the paper does not support calling BRAF inhibitors categorically ineffective as single agents. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 284 · Cited by 136

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Wan PT Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF. Cell 116, 855– 867, doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00215-6 (2004). 15035987 · DOI

Authors
Hanrahan, A. J., Chen, Z., Rosen, N., & Solit, D. B.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Solit, David B.
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-01-26
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
224-247
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W4391256944
Cited by
136
References
284
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 23
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer (P30 CA008748)
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (CA008748, P30 CA008748)
  • Cycle for Survival (P30 CA008748, U54 OD020355)
  • National Institutes of Health (U54OD020355, CA008748)
  • Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology (P30-CA008748)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA008748, R01CA229624, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
BRAF, BRAF V600E mutation, dabrafenib, trametinib, BRAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, MAPK signaling, acquired drug resistance, adaptive resistance, intrinsic resistance, RAF inhibitors, combination therapy, BRAF-mutant cancers
MeSH terms
Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Child, Humans, Imidazoles, Mutation, Neoplasms, Oximes, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review