Cardiorenal diseases in type 2 diabetes mellitus: clinical trials and real-world practice
Abstract
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can have multiple comorbidities and premature mortality due to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, hospitalization with heart failure and/or chronic kidney disease. Traditional drugs that lower glucose, such as metformin, or that treat high blood pressure and blood levels of lipids, such as renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors and statins, have organ-protective effects in patients with T2DM. Amongst patients with T2DM treated with these traditional drugs, randomized clinical trials have confirmed the additional cardiorenal benefits of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The cardiorenal benefits of SGLT2i extended to patients with heart failure and/or chronic kidney disease without T2DM, whereas incretin-based therapy (such as GLP1RA) reduced cardiovascular events in patients with obesity and T2DM. However, considerable care gaps exist owing to insufficient detection, therapeutic inertia and poor adherence to these life-saving medications. In this Review, we discuss the complex interconnections of cardiorenal-metabolic diseases and strategies to implement evidence-based practice. Furthermore, we consider the need to conduct clinical trials combined with registers in specific patient segments to evaluate existing and emerging therapies to address unmet needs in T2DM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Managing diabetes complications effectively requires early detection and timely interventions because they progress silently before severe clinical outcomes.
“Managing these complications effectively requires early detection and timely interventions, as they tend to progress silently before manifesting into more severe clinical outcomes (4).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 171 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Lim, L.-L., Chow, E., & Chan, J. C. N.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Juliana C. N.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Endocrinology
- Published
- 2022-11-29
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 151-163
- ISSN
- 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-5037
- OpenAlex
- W4310457956
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, cardiorenal disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, statins, metformin, cardiovascular risk reduction, medication adherence, therapeutic inertia, evidence-based practice
- MeSH terms
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Heart Failure, Humans, Hypertension, Renal, Hypoglycemic Agents, Nephritis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review