Cited by 64Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthInfant Health and Development

Evidence-based and mechanistic insights into exclusion diets for IBS

Moayyedi, Paul, Simrén, Magnus, Bercik, Premysl·2020·Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Abstract

Exclusion diets are becoming increasingly popular in the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Several mechanisms exist by which food items might cause gastrointestinal symptoms, such as direct osmotic effects of food in the gut lumen, changes to the gut microbiota and immune activation. These effects have been demonstrated in animal models and in human studies, particularly in the case of gluten-free diets and diets low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs). Indeed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that gluten-free diets and low-FODMAP diets improve IBS symptoms, and guidelines recommend the latter approach for treating symptoms in some patients with IBS. Designing such RCTs is challenging as participants need to eat so an 'inert' placebo is not an option. Blinding is also an issue with these studies; in the future, new exclusion diets should not advertise what the diet consists of until it is proved to reduce symptoms. In this Review, we outline the advantages and disadvantages of each choice of control group and emphasize the importance of collecting mechanistic data (regarding direct effects of food on the gut lumen, changes in gut microbiota and intestinal inflammation) as well as symptom data in RCTs of exclusion diets in IBS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41575-020-0270-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are multiple mechanisms by which food may trigger symptoms in IBS, including primary effects (eg, osmotic, chemical, immunological, mechanical or neuroendocrine) and secondary effects (eg, fermentation by-products, alterations in intraluminal pH or effects on the gut microbiome).

    “There are multiple mechanisms by which food may trigger symptoms in IBS, including primary effects (eg, osmotic, chemical, immunological, mechanical or neuroendocrine) and secondary effects (eg, fermentation by-products, alterations in intraluminal pH or effects on the gut microbiome).193 194”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 64

Authors
Moayyedi, P., Simrén, M., & Bercik, P.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Moayyedi, Paul
Venue
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Published
2020-03-02
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
406-413
ISSN
  • 1759-5045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5053
OpenAlex
W3010582389
Cited by
64
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (RN279389 – 358033)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, elimination diet, gluten-free diet, low FODMAP diet, randomized controlled trials, control group design, blinding, gut microbiota, intestinal inflammation
MeSH terms
Diet, Humans, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review