Cited by 287interferon and immune responsesImmune Response and InflammationDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Regulation of cGAS–STING signalling and its diversity of cellular outcomes

Zhang, Zhengyin, Zhang, Conggang·2025·Nature Reviews Immunology

Abstract

The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signalling pathway, which recognizes both pathogen DNA and host-derived DNA, has emerged as a crucial component of the innate immune system, having important roles in antimicrobial defence, inflammatory disease, ageing, autoimmunity and cancer. Recent work suggests that the regulation of cGAS-STING signalling is complex and sophisticated. In this Review, we describe recent insights from structural studies that have helped to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the cGAS-STING signalling cascade and we discuss how the cGAS-STING pathway is regulated by both activating and inhibitory factors. Furthermore, we summarize the newly emerging understanding of crosstalk between cGAS-STING signalling and other signalling pathways and provide examples to highlight the wide variety of cellular processes in which cGAS-STING signalling is involved, including autophagy, metabolism, ageing, inflammation and tumorigenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41577-024-01112-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cGAS-STING pathway recognizes mitochondrial DNA released during liver injury, leading to its activation and triggering inflammation with production of type I interferons and proinflammatory cytokines, which exacerbates liver inflammation and hepatocyte damage.

    “It can recognize mtDNA released during liver injury, leading to its activation and the triggering of inflammation with the production of type I interferons (IFNs) and proinflammatory cytokines, which exacerbates liver inflammation and hepatocyte damage (20–22).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 279 · Cited by 287

Authors
Zhang, Z., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
  • Center for Life Sciences (CN)
  • Shanxi Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Conggang
Venue
Nature Reviews Immunology
Published
2025-01-07
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
425-444
ISSN
  • 1474-1733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1741
OpenAlex
W4406116744
Cited by
287
References
279
Citations by year
2026: 203 · 2025: 84
FWCI
25.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
cGAS, STING, innate immunity, DNA sensing, host DNA, signaling crosstalk, autophagy, metabolism, aging, inflammation, carcinogenesis, autoimmunity, interferon signaling, structural mechanisms
MeSH terms
STING Protein, Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase, Aging, Animals, Autophagy, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Inflammation, Membrane Proteins, Neoplasms, Nucleotidyltransferases, Signal Transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review