Cited by 657Catalytic Processes in Materials ScienceElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionMachine Learning in Materials Science

Theory-guided design of catalytic materials using scaling relationships and reactivity descriptors

Zhao, Zhi-Jian, Liu, Sihang, Zha, Shenjun, Cheng, Dongfang, Studt, Felix, Henkelman, Graeme, Gong, Jinlong·2019·Nature Reviews Materials

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41578-019-0152-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Z.-J., Liu, S., Zha, S., Cheng, D., Studt, F., Henkelman, G., & Gong, J.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Gong, Jinlong
Venue
Nature Reviews Materials
Published
2019-11-21
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
792-804
ISSN
2058-8437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990956209
Cited by
657
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 52
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Reviews Materials (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
heterogeneous catalysis, scaling laws, reactivity descriptors, catalyst design, d-band theory, electronic descriptors, structural descriptors, active site, high-throughput catalyst screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review