CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 129Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMarine Ecology and Invasive Species

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Microbial invasions in terrestrial ecosystems

Open access
Thakur, Madhav P., van der Putten, Wim H., Cobben, Marleen M. P., van Kleunen, Mark, Geisen, Stefan·2019·Nature Reviews Microbiology
DOI 10.1038/s41579-019-0236-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Human travel and global trade have tremendously increased the spread of invasive microorganisms in new regions. Experimental and observational studies in terrestrial ecosystems are beginning to shed light on processes of microbial invasions, their ecological impacts and implications for ecosystem functioning. We provide examples of terrestrial invasive microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, oomycetes and other protists, and viruses, and discuss the impacts of pathogenic and non-pathogenic invasive microorganisms at levels ranging from host species to ecosystems. This Review highlights that despite the recent progress in microbial invasion research, we are only beginning to understand how alien microorganisms interact with native microorganisms, and the implications of those interactions. Finally, we propose three research themes - microbial interactions, impacts and climate change - to make microbial invasion research a truly integrative discipline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41579-019-0236-z

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbes including animal and plant pathogens are arguably the most poorly documented of all invasive alien species.

    “Microbes including animal and plant pathogens are arguably the most poorly documented of all IAS.”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Thakur et al., 2019

    The available passages contain the paper’s title and bibliographic metadata (unpaged; one is labelled Abstract), but no substantive discussion of how well microbial invasive alien species are documented. Searches for the quoted claim, pathogens, and comparisons with other invasive species returned no relevant passage, so this copy cannot verify the attribution. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 125 · Cited by 129

Research works printed but not linked: 123

  1. Chapman, D., Purse, B. V., Roy, H. E. & Bullock, J. M. Global trade networks determine the distribution of invasive non-native species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 907–917 (2017). · DOI
  2. Sikes, B. A. et al. Import volumes and biosecurity interventions shape the arrival rate of fungal pathogens. PLOS Biol. 16, e2006025 (2018). · DOI
  3. Weiss, H. et al. The airplane cabin microbiome. Microb. Ecol. 77, 87–95 (2018). · DOI
  4. Santini, A., Liebhold, A., Migliorini, D. & Woodward, S. Tracing the role of human civilization in the globalization of plant pathogens. ISME J. 12, 647–652 (2018). · DOI
  5. Bebber, D. P., Ramotowski, M. A. T. & Gurr, S. J. Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 985–988 (2013). · DOI
  6. Hulme, P. E. Climate change and biological invasions: evidence, expectations, and response options. Biol. Rev. 92, 1297–1313 (2017). · DOI
  7. Ricciardi, A. et al. Invasion science: a horizon scan of emerging challenges and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 464–474 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gladieux, P. et al. The population biology of fungal invasions. Mol. Ecol. 24, 1969–1986 (2015). · DOI
  9. Desprez-Loustau, M. L. et al. The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 472–480 (2007). This review is one of the first to highlight the potential invasion mechanisms and impacts of both pathogenic and non-pathogenic fungi. · DOI
  10. Judelson, H. S. & Blanco, F. A. The spores of Phytophthora: weapons of the plant destroyer. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 47–58 (2005). This Review provides an overview of several pathogenesis strategies of Phytophthora. · DOI
  11. Scheele, B. C. et al. Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science 363, 1459–1463 (2019). · DOI
  12. Richardson, D. M. et al. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6, 93–107 (2000). · DOI
  13. Blackburn, T. M. et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 333–339 (2011). · DOI
  14. Essl, F. et al. Which taxa are alien? Criteria, applications, and uncertainties. Bioscience 68, 496–509 (2018). · DOI
  15. Zenni, R. D. & Nuñez, M. A. The elephant in the room: the role of failed invasions in understanding invasion biology. Oikos 122, 801–815 (2013). · DOI
  16. Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. & Hyatt, A. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife – threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287, 443–449 (2000). · DOI
  17. Kolar, C. S. & Lodge, D. M. Progress in invasion biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 199–204 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  18. van Kleunen, M., Bossdorf, O. & Dawson, W. The ecology and evolution of alien plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 25–47 (2018). · DOI
  19. Jeschke, J. et al. Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota 14, 1–20 (2012). · DOI
  20. Turbelin, A. J., Malamud, B. D. & Francis, R. A. Mapping the global state of invasive alien species: patterns of invasion and policy responses. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 78–92 (2017). · DOI
  21. Dickie, I., Bolstridge, N., Cooper, J. & Peltzer, D. Co-invasion by Pinus and its mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 187, 475–484 (2010). This study shows co-invasion of Pinus trees and their associated mycorrhizal fungi in New Zealand. · DOI
  22. Mallon, C., Van Elsas, J. & Salles, J. Microbial invasions: the process, patterns, and mechanisms. Trends Microbiol. 23, 719–729 (2015). · DOI
  23. Van der Putten, W. H., Klironomos, J. N. & Wardle, D. A. Microbial ecology of biological invasions. ISME J. 1, 28–37 (2007). · DOI
  24. Dickie, I. A. et al. The emerging science of linked plant–fungal invasions. New Phytol. 215, 1314–1332 (2017). · DOI
  25. Vellinga, E., Wolfe, B. & Pringle, A. Global patterns of ectomycorrhizal introductions. New Phytol. 181, 960–973 (2009). This global analysis provides a list of ectomycorrhizal introductions. · DOI
  26. Lymbery, A. J., Morine, M., Kanani, H. G., Beatty, S. J. & Morgan, D. L. Co-invaders: the effects of alien parasites on native hosts. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 3, 171–177 (2014). · DOI
  27. Correia, M., Heleno, R., da Silva, L. P., Costa, J. M. & Rodríguez-Echeverría, S. First evidence for the joint dispersal of mycorrhizal fungi and plant diaspores by birds. New Phytol. 222, 1054–1060 (2019). · DOI
  28. Nuñez, M. A. et al. Exotic mammals disperse exotic fungi that promote invasion by exotic trees. PLOS ONE 8, e66832 (2013). · DOI
  29. Mitchell, C. & Torchin, M. Parasites, pathogens, and invasions by plants and animals. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2, 183–190 (2004). · DOI
  30. Amsellem, L. et al. Importance of microorganisms to macroorganisms invasions. Adv. Ecol. Res. 57, 99–146 (2017). · DOI
  31. Banks, N. C., Paini, D. R., Bayliss, K. L. & Hodda, M. The role of global trade and transport network topology in the human-mediated dispersal of alien species. Ecol. Lett. 18, 188–199 (2015). · DOI
  32. Dutech, C. et al. The chestnut blight fungus world tour: successive introduction events from diverse origins in an invasive plant fungal pathogen. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3931–3946 (2012). This study reveals that C. parasitica became invasive in North America and western Europe owing to multiple introduction events. · DOI
  33. Rigling, D. & Prospero, S. Cryphonectria parasitica, the causal agent of chestnut blight: invasion history, population biology and disease control. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 7–20 (2018). · DOI
  34. Young, H. S., Parker, I. M., Gilbert, G. S., Sofia Guerra, A. & Nunn, C. L. Introduced species, disease ecology, and biodiversity–disease relationships. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 41–54 (2017). · DOI
  35. Parker, I. & Gilbert, G. The evolutionary ecology of novel plant-pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 675–700 (2004). · DOI
  36. Anderson, R. & May, R. The invasion, persistence and spread of infectious diseases within animal and plant communities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 533–570 (1986). · DOI
  37. Melotto, M., Underwood, W., Koczan, J., Nomura, K. & He, S. Y. Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell 126, 969–980 (2006). · DOI
  38. Anderson, P. K. et al. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 535–544 (2004). · DOI
  39. Tyler, B. M. et al. Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science 313, 1261–1266 (2006). · DOI
  40. Grunwald, N., Goss, E. & Press, C. Phytophthora ramorum: a pathogen with a remarkably wide host range causing sudden oak death on oaks and ramorum blight on woody ornamentals. Mol. Plant Pathol. 9, 729–740 (2008). · DOI
  41. Elton, C. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (Methuen, 1958). · DOI
  42. Levine, J. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288, 852–854 (2000). · DOI
  43. van Elsas, J. D. et al. Microbial diversity determines the invasion of soil by a bacterial pathogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1159–1164 (2012). · DOI
  44. Eisenhauer, N., Schulz, W., Scheu, S. & Jousset, A. Niche dimensionality links biodiversity and invasibility of microbial communities. Funct. Ecol. 27, 282–288 (2013). · DOI
  45. Lockwood, J. L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 223–228 (2005). · DOI
  46. Acosta, F., Zamor, R. M., Najar, F. Z., Roe, B. A. & Hambright, K. D. Dynamics of an experimental microbial invasion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11594–11599 (2015). · DOI
  47. Haas, S. E., Hooten, M. B., Rizzo, D. M. & Meentemeyer, R. K. Forest species diversity reduces disease risk in a generalist plant pathogen invasion. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1108–1116 (2011). This study confirmed diversity–invasibility relationships for a plant pathogen from a field study. · DOI
  48. Vilà, M. et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 14, 702–708 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Cameron, E. K., Vilà, M. & Cabeza, M. Global meta-analysis of the impacts of terrestrial invertebrate invaders on species, communities and ecosystems. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 596–606 (2016). · DOI
  50. Litchman, E. Invisible invaders: non-pathogenic invasive microbes in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1560–1572 (2010). · DOI
  51. Brader, G. et al. Ecology and genomic insights into plant-pathogenic and plant-nonpathogenic endophytes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55, 61–83 (2017). · DOI
  52. Jung, T., Colquhoun, I. J. & Hardy, G. E. S. J. New insights into the survival strategy of the invasive soilborne pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi in different natural ecosystems in Western Australia. For. Pathol. 43, 266–288 (2013). · DOI
  53. Hee, W. Y., Torreña, P. S., Blackman, L. M. & Hardham, A. R. in Phytophthora: A Global Perspective Vol. 2 (ed. Lamour, K.) 124 (CABI, 2013). · DOI
  54. Day, N. J., Dunfield, K. E. & Antunes, P. M. Fungi from a non-native invasive plant increase its growth but have different growth effects on native plants. Biol. Invasions 18, 231–243 (2016). · DOI
  55. Simberloff, D. & Von Holle, B. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol. Invasions 1, 21–32 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Reisen, W. K. Landscape epidemiology of vector-borne diseases. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 461–483 (2010). · DOI
  57. Taerum, S. J. et al. Putative origins of the fungus Leptographium procerum. Fungal Biol. 121, 82–94 (2017). · DOI
  58. Lorch, J. M. et al. Experimental infection of bats with Geomyces destructans causes white-nose syndrome. Nature 480, 376–378 (2011). · DOI
  59. Warnecke, L. et al. Inoculation of bats with European Geomyces destructans supports the novel pathogen hypothesis for the origin of white-nose syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6999–7003 (2012). · DOI
  60. Zukal, J. et al. White-nose syndrome without borders: Pseudogymnoascus destructans infection tolerated in Europe and Palearctic Asia but not in North America. Sci. Rep. 6, 19829 (2016). · DOI
  61. Rodríguez-Echeverría, S. Rhizobial hitchhikers from down under: invasional meltdown in a plant-bacteria mutualism? J. Biogeogr. 37, 1611–1622 (2010). This article reveals invasional meltdown in plant–microorganism interactions. · DOI
  62. Kamutando, C. N. et al. The functional potential of the rhizospheric microbiome of an invasive tree species, Acacia dealbata. Microb. Ecol. 77, 191–200 (2019). · DOI
  63. Klironomos, J. Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84, 2292–2301 (2003). This study is one of the first to show differences in plant responses to alien and native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Chalkowski, K., Lepczyk, C. A. & Zohdy, S. Parasite ecology of invasive species: conceptual framework and new hypotheses. Trends Parasitol. 34, 655–663 (2018). · DOI
  65. Johnson, P. T. J., De Roode, J. C. & Fenton, A. Why infectious disease research needs community ecology. Science 349, 1259504 (2015). · DOI
  66. Parker, I. M. et al. Phylogenetic structure and host abundance drive disease pressure in communities. Nature 520, 542–544 (2015). This study shows how community characteristics can influence disease outcomes. · DOI
  67. Li, S.-P., Tan, J., Yang, X., Ma, C. & Jiang, L. Niche and fitness differences determine invasion success and impact in laboratory bacterial communities. ISME J. 13, 402–412 (2019). · DOI
  68. Kinnunen, M., Dechesne, A., Albrechtsen, H.-J. & Smets, B. F. Stochastic processes govern invasion success in microbial communities when the invader is phylogenetically close to resident bacteria. ISME J. 12, 2748–2756 (2018). · DOI
  69. Van Kleunen, M., Weber, E. & Fischer, M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13, 235–245 (2010). · DOI
  70. McCary, M. A., Mores, R., Farfan, M. A. & Wise, D. H. Invasive plants have different effects on trophic structure of green and brown food webs in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 19, 328–335 (2016). · DOI
  71. Vitousek, P. & Walker, L. Biological invasion by Myrica Faya in Hawaii: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol. Monogr. 59, 247–265 (1989). · DOI
  72. Spoel, S. H. & Dong, X. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 89–100 (2012). · DOI
  73. Gilman, S. E., Urban, M. C., Tewksbury, J., Gilchrist, G. W. & Holt, R. D. A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 325–331 (2010). · DOI
  74. Newman, M., Barbási, A.-L. & Watts, D. The Structure and Dynamics of Networks (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011). · DOI
  75. Delmas, E. et al. Analysing ecological networks of species interactions. Biol. Rev. 94, 16–36 (2019). · DOI
  76. Ramirez, K. S., Geisen, S., Morriën, E., Snoek, B. L. & van der Putten, W. H. Network analyses can advance above-belowground ecology. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 759–768 (2018). · DOI
  77. Tylianakis, J. M. & Morris, R. J. Ecological networks across environmental gradients. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 25–48 (2017). · DOI
  78. McGeoch, M. A. et al. Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Divers. Distrib. 16, 95–108 (2010). · DOI
  79. Roy, H. E. et al. Alien pathogens on the horizon: opportunities for predicting their threat to wildlife. Conserv. Lett. 10, 476–483 (2017). · DOI
  80. Rizzo, D. M. & Garbelotto, M. Sudden oak death: endangering California and Oregon forest ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 197–204 (2003). · DOI
  81. Wingfield, M. J. et al. Novel and co-evolved associations between insects and microorganisms as drivers of forest pestilence. Biol. Invasions 18, 1045–1056 (2016). · DOI
  82. Dunn, A. M. & Hatcher, M. J. Parasites and biological invasions: parallels, interactions, and control. Trends Parasitol. 31, 189–199 (2015). · DOI
  83. Tedersoo, L., Tooming-Klunderud, A. & Anslan, S. Methods PacBio metabarcoding of fungi and other eukaryotes: errors, biases and perspectives. New Phytol. 217, 1370–1385 (2017). · DOI
  84. Koskella, B., Hall, L. J. & Metcalf, C. J. E. The microbiome beyond the horizon of ecological and evolutionary theory. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1606–1615 (2017). · DOI
  85. Hanlon, S. J. O. et al. Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines. Science 627, 621–627 (2018). This study uses whole-genome sequencing of chytrid fungi to estimate spatiotemporal origins. · DOI
  86. Jeschke, J. M. General hypotheses in invasion ecology. Divers. Distrib. 20, 1229–1234 (2014). · DOI
  87. Gilligan, C. A. & van den Bosch, F. Epidemiological models for invasion and persistence of pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 46, 385–418 (2008). · DOI
  88. Madigan, M., Bender, K., Buckley, D., Sattley, W. & Stahl, D. Brock Biology of Microorganisms 15th edn (Pearson Education Limited, 2019).
  89. Ribet, D. & Cossart, P. How bacterial pathogens colonize their hosts and invade deeper tissues. Microbes Infect. 17, 173–183 (2015). · DOI
  90. Mazza, G., Tricarico, E., Genovesi, P. & Gherardi, F. Biological invaders are threats to human health: an overview. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 26, 112–129 (2014). · DOI
  91. Hulme, P. Invasive species challenge the global response to emerging diseases. Trends Parasitol. 30, 267–270 (2014). · DOI
  92. Paupy, C., Delatte, H., Bagny, L., Corbel, V. & Fontenille, D. Aedes albopictus, an arbovirus vector: from the darkness to the light. Microbes Infect. 11, 1177–1185 (2009). · DOI
  93. Anda, P. et al. Waterborne outbreak of tularemia associated with crayfish fishing. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7, 575–582 (2001). · DOI
  94. Mazza, G. & Tricarcio, E. (eds) Invasive Species and Human Health (CABI, 2018). · DOI
  95. Amalfitano, S., Coci, M., Corno, G. & Luna, G. M. A microbial perspective on biological invasions in aquatic ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 746, 13–22 (2014). · DOI
  96. Harvell, C. et al. Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science 296, 2158–2162 (2002). · DOI
  97. Verant, M. L., Boyles, J. G., Waldrep, W., Wibbelt, G. & Blehert, D. S. Temperature-dependent growth of Geomyces destructans, the fungus that causes bat White-nose syndrome. PLOS ONE 7, e46280 (2012). · DOI
  98. O’connor, M. I. & Bernhardt, J. R. The metabolic theory of ecology and the cost of parasitism. PLOS Biol. 16, e2005628 (2018). · DOI
  99. Cohen, J. M. et al. The thermal mismatch hypothesis explains host susceptibility to an emerging infectious disease. Ecol. Lett. 20, 184–193 (2017). · DOI
  100. Clare, F. C. et al. Climate forcing of an emerging pathogenic fungus across a montane multi-host community. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150454 (2016). · DOI
  101. Mckinney, L., Thomsen, I., Kjær, E., Bengtsson, S. & Nielsen, L. Rapid invasion by an aggressive pathogenic fungus (Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus) replaces a native decomposer (Hymenoscyphus albidus): a case of local cryptic extinction? Fungal Ecol. 5, 663–669 (2012). · DOI
  102. Kozanitas, M., Osmundson, T. W., Linzer, R. & Garbelotto, M. Interspecific interactions between the sudden oak death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum and two sympatric Phytophthora species in varying ecological conditions. Fungal Ecol. 28, 86–96 (2017). · DOI
  103. Rizzo, D. M., Garbelotto, M. & Hansen, E. M. Phytophthora ramorum: integrative research and management of an emerging pathogen in California and Oregon forests. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 43, 309–335 (2005). · DOI
  104. Grünwald, N. J., Garbelotto, M., Goss, E. M., Heungens, K. & Prospero, S. Emergence of the sudden oak death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Trends Microbiol. 20, 131–138 (2012). · DOI
  105. Hardham, A. & Blackman, L. Phytophthora cinnamomi. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 260–285 (2018). · DOI
  106. Robin, C. et al. Root and aerial infections of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana by Phytophthora lateralis: a new threat for European countries. For. Pathol. 41, 417–424 (2011). · DOI
  107. Thoirain, B., Husson, C. & Marçais, B. Risk factors for the Phytophthora -induced decline of alder in northeastern France. Phytopathology 97, 99–105 (2007). · DOI
  108. Zambino, P. J. Biology and pathology of Ribes and their implications for management of white pine blister rust. For. Pathol. 40, 264–291 (2010). · DOI
  109. Geils, B. & Vogler, D. A. in The Future of High-Elevation, Five-Needle White Pines in Western North America: Proceedings of the High Five Symposium (eds Keane, R., Tomback, D., Murray, M. & Smith, C.) 210–217 (U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 2011).
  110. Kowalski, T. & Holdenrieder, O. Pathogenicity of Chalara fraxinea. For. Pathol. 39, 1–7 (2009). · DOI
  111. Cleary, M. et al. Friend or foe? Biological and ecological traits of the European ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in its native environment. Sci. Rep. 6, 21895 (2016). · DOI
  112. Anagnostakis, S. L. Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79, 23–37 (1987). · DOI
  113. Broders, K., Boraks, A., Barbison, L., Brown, J. & Boland, G. J. Recent insights into the pandemic disease butternut canker caused by the invasive pathogen Ophiognomonia clavigignenti-juglandacearum. For. Pathol. 45, 1–8 (2015). · DOI
  114. Carnegie, A. J. et al. Impact of the invasive rust Puccinia psidii (myrtle rust) on native Myrtaceae in natural ecosystems in Australia. Biol. Invasions 18, 127–144 (2016). · DOI
  115. Carr, D. E. & Banas, L. E. Dogwood anthracnose (Discula destructiva): effects of and consequences for host (Cornus florida) demography. Am. Midl. Nat. 143, 169–177 (2000). · DOI
  116. Ploetz, R. C. et al. Responses of avocado to laurel wilt, caused by Raffaelea lauricola. Plant Pathol. 61, 801–808 (2012). · DOI
  117. Juzwik, J., Harrington, T. C., MacDonald, W. L. & Appel, D. N. The origin of Ceratocystis fagacearum, the oak wilt fungus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 46, 13–26 (2008). · DOI
  118. Wingfield, M. J. et al. Pitch canker caused by Fusarium circinatum – a growing threat to pine plantations and forests worldwide. Australas. Plant Pathol. 37, 319–334 (2008). · DOI
  119. Garbelotto, M. & Gonthier, P. Biology, epidemiology, and control of Heterobasidion Species worldwide. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 51, 39–59 (2013). · DOI
  120. Brasier, C. in Genetics of Plant Pathogenic Fungi 1st edn Vol. 6 (ed. Sidhu, G. S.) 207–223 (Academic Press, 1988). · DOI
  121. Comeau, A. M. et al. Functional annotation of the ophiostoma novo-ulmi genome: insights into the phytopathogenicity of the fungal agent of Dutch elm disease. Genome Biol. Evol. 7, 410–430 (2015). · DOI
  122. Baker, C. J., Harrington, T. C., Krauss, U. & Alfenas, A. C. Genetic variability and host specialization in the Latin American clade of Ceratocystis fimbriata. Phytopathology 93, 1274–1284 (2003). · DOI
  123. Muir, J. A. & Cobb, F. W. Infection of radiata and bishop pine by Mycosphaerella pini in California. Can. J. For. Res. 35, 2529–2538 (2005). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Thakur, M. P., van der Putten, W. H., Cobben, M. M. P., van Kleunen, M., & Geisen, S.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NL)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
Thakur, Madhav P.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-07-26
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
621-631
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
DOI
10.1038/s41579-019-0236-z
OpenAlex
W2962880972
Cited by
129
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TH 2307/1‐1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
Keywords
microbial invasion, terrestrial ecosystems, invasive fungi, oomycete, protists, plant viruses, pathogenic microorganisms, non-pathogenic microorganisms, microbial interactions, ecosystem functioning, climate change, human-mediated dispersal
MeSH terms
Host Microbial Interactions, Animals, Humans, Plants, Travel, Ecosystem, Microbial Interactions, Climate Change, Introduced Species, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review