Cited by 204Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchEscherichia coli research studiesToxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins

Clostridioides difficile toxins: mechanisms of action and antitoxin therapeutics

Open access
Kordus, Shannon L., Thomas, Audrey K., Lacy, D. Borden·2022·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile is a Gram-positive anaerobe that can cause a spectrum of disorders that range in severity from mild diarrhoea to fulminant colitis and/or death. The bacterium produces up to three toxins, which are considered the major virulence factors in C. difficile infection. These toxins promote inflammation, tissue damage and diarrhoea. In this Review, we highlight recent biochemical and structural advances in our understanding of the mechanisms that govern host-toxin interactions. Understanding how C. difficile toxins affect the host forms a foundation for developing novel strategies for treatment and prevention of C. difficile infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41579-021-00660-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An internal Cys protease domain activates the Clostridioides difficile toxin resulting in downstream effects on host cells.

    “An internal Cys protease domain activates the toxin resulting in downstream effects on host cells.84”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 175 · Cited by 204

Authors
Kordus, S. L., Thomas, A. K., & Lacy, D. B.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Lacy, D. Borden
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2021-11-26
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
285-298
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W3215599992
Cited by
204
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 22
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX002943)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM139303)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI095755, R37AI095755)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
Keywords
Clostridium difficile, C. difficile toxin, toxin mechanism of action, colitis, virulence factors, inflammation
MeSH terms
Antitoxins, Bacterial Proteins, Bacterial Toxins, Diarrhea, Humans, Clostridioides difficile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review