Forgetting as a form of adaptive engram cell plasticity
Abstract
One leading hypothesis suggests that memories are stored in ensembles of neurons (or 'engram cells') and that successful recall involves reactivation of these ensembles. A logical extension of this idea is that forgetting occurs when engram cells cannot be reactivated. Forms of 'natural forgetting' vary considerably in terms of their underlying mechanisms, time course and reversibility. However, we suggest that all forms of forgetting involve circuit remodelling that switches engram cells from an accessible state (where they can be reactivated by natural recall cues) to an inaccessible state (where they cannot). In many cases, forgetting rates are modulated by environmental conditions and we therefore propose that forgetting is a form of neuroplasticity that alters engram cell accessibility in a manner that is sensitive to mismatches between expectations and the environment. Moreover, we hypothesize that disease states associated with forgetting may hijack natural forgetting mechanisms, resulting in reduced engram cell accessibility and memory loss.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our findings support recent frameworks suggesting that retrieval failure reflects reduced accessibility, rather than loss, of a stored engram.
“Furthermore, our findings support recent frameworks suggesting that retrieval failure reflects reduced accessibility, rather than loss, of a stored engram.”
From Infraslow histaminergic dynamics govern priming states to gate moment-to-moment memory accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 234 · Cited by 182
- Authors
- Ryan, T. J., & Frankland, P. W.
- Affiliations
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ryan, Tomás J.
- Frankland, Paul W.
- Venue
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience
- Published
- 2022-01-13
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 173-186
- ISSN
- 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0048
- OpenAlex
- W4205293093
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 234
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- forgetting, engram cells, neural reactivation, neuroplasticity, environmental predictability, memory loss, adaptive forgetting, memory retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Cell Plasticity, Adaptation, Physiological, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Mental Recall
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review