From mucosal infection to successful cancer immunotherapy
Abstract
The clinical management of advanced malignancies of the upper and lower urinary tract has been revolutionized with the advent of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). ICBs reinstate or bolster pre-existing immune responses while creating new T cell specificities. Immunogenic cancers, which tend to benefit more from immunotherapy than cold tumours, harbour tumour-specific neoantigens, often associated with a high tumour mutational burden, as well as CD8+ T cell infiltrates and ectopic lymphoid structures. The identification of beneficial non-self tumour antigens and natural adjuvants is the focus of current investigation. Moreover, growing evidence suggests that urinary or intestinal commensals, BCG and uropathogenic Escherichia coli influence long-term responses in patients with kidney or bladder cancer treated with ICBs. Bacteria infecting urothelium could be a prominent target for T follicular helper cells and B cells, linking innate and cognate CD8+ memory responses. In the urinary tract, commensal flora differ between healthy and tumoural mucosae. Although antibiotics can affect the prognosis of urinary tract malignancies, bacteria can have a major influence on cancer immunosurveillance. Beyond their role as biomarkers, immune responses against uropathogenic commensals could be harnessed for the design of future immunoadjuvants that can be advantageously combined with ICBs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IgG antibodies against microbial antigens prevent pathogen outgrowth, maintain systemic homeostasis during bacteremia with Gram-negative commensals, and boost immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in urothelial cancers infected by bacteria.
“IgG antibodies specific for microbial antigens subserve various functions including preventing the outgrowth of pathogens, maintenance of systemic homeostasis during bacteremia with Gram-negative commensals 43 and boosting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial cancers infected by bacteria 44,45”
From Impact of the ONCOBIOME network in cancer microbiome research (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 203 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Goubet, A.-G., Rouanne, M., Derosa, L., Kroemer, G., & Zitvogel, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Zitvogel, Laurence
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Urology
- Published
- 2023-07-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 682-700
- ISSN
- 1759-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4820
- OpenAlex
- W4383907620
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 203
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Urology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-RHUS-0017)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
- Keywords
- immune checkpoint inhibitors, urinary tract cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, tumor surveillance, uropathogenic Escherichia coli, BCG, commensal bacteria, urinary microbiome, antibiotics, urinary tract infection, tumor mutational burden, neoantigens, immunoadjuvant, T follicular helper cells, cancer immunotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Adjuvants, Immunologic, Antigens, Neoplasm, Urinary Bladder, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Humans, Immunotherapy, Prognosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review