CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hominin occupation of the Chinese Loess Plateau since about 2.1 million years ago

Zhu, Zhaoyu, Dennell, Robin, Huang, Weiwen, Wu, Yi, Qiu, Shifan, Yang, Shixia, Rao, Zhiguo, Hou, Yamei, Xie, Jiubing, Han, Jiangwei, Ouyang, Tingping·2018·Nature
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0299-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Considerable attention has been paid to dating the earliest appearance of hominins outside Africa. The earliest skeletal and artefactual evidence for the genus Homo in Asia currently comes from Dmanisi, Georgia, and is dated to approximately 1.77-1.85 million years ago (Ma) 1 . Two incisors that may belong to Homo erectus come from Yuanmou, south China, and are dated to 1.7 Ma 2 ; the next-oldest evidence is an H. erectus cranium from Lantian (Gongwangling)-which has recently been dated to 1.63 Ma 3 -and the earliest hominin fossils from the Sangiran dome in Java, which are dated to about 1.5-1.6 Ma 4 . Artefacts from Majuangou III 5 and Shangshazui 6 in the Nihewan basin, north China, have also been dated to 1.6-1.7 Ma. Here we report an Early Pleistocene and largely continuous artefact sequence from Shangchen, which is a newly discovered Palaeolithic locality of the southern Chinese Loess Plateau, near Gongwangling in Lantian county. The site contains 17 artefact layers that extend from palaeosol S15-dated to approximately 1.26 Ma-to loess L28, which we date to about 2.12 Ma. This discovery implies that hominins left Africa earlier than indicated by the evidence from Dmanisi.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0299-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Ferring, R. et al. Earliest human occupations at Dmanisi (Georgian Caucasus) dated to 1.85–1.78 Ma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10432–10436 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Zhu, R. X. et al. Early evidence of the genus Homo in East Asia. J. Hum. Evol. 55, 1075–1085 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Zhu, Z. Y. et al. New dating of the Homo erectus cranium from Lantian (Gongwangling), China. J. Hum. Evol. 78, 144–157 (2015). · DOI
  4. Zaim, Y. et al. New 1.5 million-year-old Homo erectus maxilla from Sangiran (Central Java, Indonesia). J. Hum. Evol. 61, 363–376 (2011). · DOI
  5. Zhu, R. X. et al. New evidence on the earliest human presence at high northern latitudes in northeast Asia. Nature 431, 559–562 (2004). · DOI
  6. Ao, H., Dekkers, M. J., Wei, Q., Qiang, X. & Xiao, G. New evidence for early presence of hominids in North China. Sci. Rep. 3, 2403 (2013). · DOI
  7. Liu, T. S. et al. Loess and the Environment (China Ocean, Beijing, 1985).
  8. Rutter, N., Ding, Z., Evans, M. E. & Liu, T. Baoji-type pedostratigraphic section, Loess Plateau, north-central China. Quat. Sci. Rev. 10, 1–22 (1991). · DOI
  9. Lisiecki, L. E. & Raymo, M. E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, PA1003 (2005).
  10. Ding, Z. L. et al. Stacked 2.6-Ma grain size record from the Chinese loess based on five sections and correlation with the deep-sea 18O record. Paleoceanography 17, 5-1–5-21 (2002). · DOI
  11. Heller, F. & Liu, T.-S. Magnetostratigraphical dating of loess deposits in China. Nature 300, 431–433 (1982). · DOI
  12. Kukla, G. & An, Z. Loess stratigraphy in central China. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 72, 203–225 (1989). · DOI
  13. Zheng, H., An, Z. & Shaw, J. New contributions to Chinese Plio-Pleistocene magnetostratigraphy. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 70, 146–153 (1992). · DOI
  14. Heslop, D., Langereis, C. G. & Dekkers, M. J. A new astronomical timescale for the loess deposits of Northern China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 184, 125–139 (2000). · DOI
  15. Guo, Z. T., Jiang, W. Y., Lu, H. Y., Wu, N. Q. & Yao, X. F. Pleistocene climate extremes in East Asia and their causes. Earth Sci. Frontiers 9, 113–120 (2002).
  16. Liu, Q., Roberts, A. P., Rohling, E. J., Zhu, R. & Sun, Y. Post-depositional remanent magnetization lock-in and the location of the Matuyama–Brunhes geomagnetic reversal boundary in marine and Chinese loess sequences. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 275, 102–110 (2008). · DOI
  17. Gibbard, P. & Cohen, K. M. Global chronostratigraphical correlation table for the last 2.7 million years. Episodes 31, 243–247 (2008). · DOI
  18. Liu, Q. et al. Magnetostratigraphy of Chinese loess–paleosol sequences. Earth Sci. Rev. 150, 139–167 (2015). · DOI
  19. Sun, Y., Clemens, S. C., An, Z. & Yu, Z. Astronomical timescale and palaeoclimatic implication of stacked 3.6-Myr monsoon records from the Chinese Loess Plateau. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 33–48 (2006). · DOI
  20. An, Z. & Ho, C. New magnetostratigraphic dates of Lantian Homo erectus. Quat. Res. 32, 213–221 (1989). · DOI
  21. Dai, E.-J. & Chi, H.-G. Discovery of palaeoliths at Lantian, Shensi. Vertebrata PalAsiatica 8, 152–156, 161 (1964).
  22. Tai, E. C. & Hsu, C. H. New finds of palaeoliths from Lantian. Acta Archaeologica Sinica 1, 1–12 (1973).
  23. Wang, S. et al. Newly discovered Palaeolithic artefacts from loess deposits and their ages in Lantian, central China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 651–661 (2014). · DOI
  24. Zhuo, H. X. et al. Chronology of newly-discovered paleolithic artifact assemblages in Lantian (Shaanxi province), central China. Quat. Res. 86, 316–325 (2016). · DOI
  25. Cande, S. C. & Kent, D. V. Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6093–6095 (1995). · DOI
  26. Ogg, J. G. in The Geologic Time Scale 2012 (eds Gradstein, F. M. et al.) 85–114 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2012). · DOI
  27. Roberts, A. P. Geomagnetic excursions: knowns and unknowns. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L17307 (2008). · DOI
  28. Kappelman, J. et al. in Geology and Paleontology of the Miocene Sinap Formation, Turkey (eds Fortelius, M. et al.) 41–66 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 2003).
  29. Ranov, V. The ‘loessic palaeolithic’ in South Tadjikistan, central Asia: its industries, chronology and correlation. Quat. Sci. Rev. 14, 731–745 (1995). · DOI
  30. Sun, Y. B., Lu, H. Y. & An, Z. S. Grain size distribution of quartz isolated from Chinese loess/paleosol. Chin. Sci. Bull. 45, 2296–2298 (2000). · DOI
  31. Liu, Q., Deng, C., Torrent, J. & Zhu, R. Review of recent developments in mineral magnetism of Chinese loess. Quat. Sci. Rev. 26, 368–385 (2007). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, Z., Dennell, R., Huang, W., Wu, Y., Qiu, S., Yang, S., Rao, Z., Hou, Y., Xie, J., Han, J., & Ouyang, T.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-07
Volume
559
Issue
7715
Pages
608-612
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/s41586-018-0299-4
Cited by
202
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hominin occupation of the Chinese Loess Plateau since about 2.1 million years ago. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-018-0299-4
The paper
Zhu, Z., Dennell, R., Huang, W., Wu, Y., Qiu, S., Yang, S., Rao, Z., Hou, Y., Xie, J., Han, J., & Ouyang, T. (2018). Hominin occupation of the Chinese Loess Plateau since about 2.1 million years ago. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0299-4