Cited by 261Neuroscience and Music PerceptionMultisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory Interactions

A cortical filter that learns to suppress the acoustic consequences of movement

Open access
Schneider, David M., Sundararajan, Janani, Mooney, Richard·2018·Nature

Abstract

Sounds can arise from the environment and also predictably from many of our own movements, such as vocalizing, walking, or playing music. The capacity to anticipate these movement-related (reafferent) sounds and distinguish them from environmental sounds is essential for normal hearing 1,2, but the neural circuits that learn to anticipate the often arbitrary and changeable sounds that result from our movements remain largely unknown. Here we developed an acoustic virtual reality (aVR) system in which a mouse learned to associate a novel sound with its locomotor movements, allowing us to identify the neural circuit mechanisms that learn to suppress reafferent sounds and to probe the behavioural consequences of this predictable sensorimotor experience. We found that aVR experience gradually and selectively suppressed auditory cortical responses to the reafferent frequency, in part by strengthening motor cortical activation of auditory cortical inhibitory neurons that respond to the reafferent tone. This plasticity is behaviourally adaptive, as aVR-experienced mice showed an enhanced ability to detect non-reafferent tones during movement. Together, these findings describe a dynamic sensory filter that involves motor cortical inputs to the auditory cortex that can be shaped by experience to selectively suppress the predictable acoustic consequences of movement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0520-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Locomotion is correlated with reductions in response gain in primary auditory cortex (A1), suggesting state-dependent gain modulation may vary between different brain areas.

    “By contrast, locomotion is correlated with reductions in response gain in the primary auditory cortex (A1), suggesting that state-dependent gain modulation may vary between different brain areas38,39.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 261

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Franklin KB, and Paxinos George. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates, compact The coronal plates and diagrams. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press, 2008.
  2. [28]Rummell Brian P., Klee Jan L., and Sigurdsson Torfi “ Attenuation of responses to self-generated sounds in auditory cortical neurons.” Journal of Neuroscience 36 47 (2016): 12010– 12026. 27881785 PMC6604922

Authors
Schneider, D. M., Sundararajan, J., & Mooney, R.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-09
Volume
561
Issue
7723
Pages
391-395
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2889901471
Cited by
261
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dc013826-09)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC018802, R01-DC013826)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
auditory cortex, motor cortex, cortical inhibition, auditory plasticity, sensorimotor learning, mouse auditory system
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Acoustics, Animals, Auditory Cortex, Female, Locomotion, Male, Models, Neurological, Motor Cortex, Movement, Neural Inhibition, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review