Nuclear envelope assembly defects link mitotic errors to chromothripsis
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Defects in the architecture or integrity of the nuclear envelope are associated with a variety of human diseases 1. Micronuclei, one common nuclear aberration, are an origin for chromothripsis 2, a catastrophic mutational process that is commonly observed in cancer 3-5. Chromothripsis occurs after micronuclei spontaneously lose nuclear envelope integrity, which generates chromosome fragmentation 6. Disruption of the nuclear envelope exposes DNA to the cytoplasm and initiates innate immune proinflammatory signalling 7. Despite its importance, the basis of the fragility of the micronucleus nuclear envelope is not known. Here we show that micronuclei undergo defective nuclear envelope assembly. Only 'core' nuclear envelope proteins 8,9 assemble efficiently on lagging chromosomes, whereas 'non-core' nuclear envelope proteins 8,9, including nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), do not. Consequently, micronuclei fail to properly import key proteins that are necessary for the integrity of the nuclear envelope and genome. We show that spindle microtubules block assembly of NPCs and other non-core nuclear envelope proteins on lagging chromosomes, causing an irreversible defect in nuclear envelope assembly. Accordingly, experimental manipulations that position missegregated chromosomes away from the spindle correct defective nuclear envelope assembly, prevent spontaneous nuclear envelope disruption, and suppress DNA damage in micronuclei. Thus, during mitotic exit in metazoan cells, chromosome segregation and nuclear envelope assembly are only loosely coordinated by the timing of mitotic spindle disassembly. The absence of precise checkpoint controls may explain why errors during mitotic exit are frequent and often trigger catastrophic genome rearrangements 4,5.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MN have defective nuclear envelope assembly, with deficient nuclear pore complexes and attenuated nuclear transport.
“MN have defective nuclear envelope assembly, characterized by deficiency of nuclear pore complexes and attenuated nuclear transport (Liu et al., 2018), which affects many processes in MN, including defective replication and repair of MN DNA (Crasta et al., 2012; Hatch et al., 2013; Umbreit et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2015).”
From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2018
These parallels include nuclear envelope dysfunction, changes in lamina structure, accumulation of DNA damage, and downstream activation of cGAS.
“These parallels include nuclear envelope dysfunction, changes in lamina structure, accumulation of DNA damage, and downstream activation of cGAS (Liu et al., 2018).”
From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 314
- Authors
- Liu, S., Kwon, M., Mannino, M., Yang, N., Renda, F., Khodjakov, A., & Pellman, D.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- New York State Department of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pellman, David
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-09-19
- Volume
- 561
- Issue
- 7724
- Pages
- 551-555
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC6599625
- OpenAlex
- W2952728370
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Yale University
- National Institutes of Health (GM61345)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA213404)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM059363, R37GM061345, R35GM130298)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- nuclear envelope assembly, chromothripsis, micronuclei, nuclear pore complex, mitotic spindle, chromosome segregation errors, mitotic exit, genomic instability, chromosome fragmentation, nuclear envelope proteins, DNA damage, spindle assembly checkpoint
- MeSH terms
- Chromothripsis, Chromosomes, Human, DNA, DNA Damage, Humans, Microtubules, Mitosis, Spindle Apparatus, Nuclear Envelope, Chromosome Segregation, Nuclear Pore, Genomic Instability, Cell Line, Tumor, Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective, Cell Cycle Checkpoints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review