Cited by 83Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyCultural Heritage Materials AnalysisEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Dinosaur egg colour had a single evolutionary origin

Wiemann, Jasmina, Yang, Tzu-Ruei, Norell, Mark A.·2018·Nature

Abstract

Birds are the only living amniotes with coloured eggs 1-4, which have long been considered to be an avian innovation 1,3. A recent study has demonstrated the presence of both red-brown protoporphyrin IX and blue-green biliverdin 5-the pigments responsible for all the variation in avian egg colour-in fossilized eggshell of a nonavian dinosaur 6. This raises the fundamental question of whether modern birds inherited egg colour from their nonavian dinosaur ancestors, or whether egg colour evolved independently multiple times. Here we present a phylogenetic assessment of egg colour in nonavian dinosaurs. We applied high-resolution Raman microspectroscopy to eggshells that represent all of the major clades of dinosaurs, and found that egg colour pigments were preserved in all eumaniraptorans: egg colour had a single evolutionary origin in nonavian theropod dinosaurs. The absence of colour in ornithischian and sauropod eggs represents a true signal rather than a taphonomic artefact. Pigment surface maps revealed that nonavian eumaniraptoran eggs were spotted and speckled, and colour pattern diversity in these eggs approaches that in extant birds, which indicates that reproductive behaviours in nonavian dinosaurs were far more complex than previously known 3. Depth profiles demonstrated identical mechanisms of pigment deposition in nonavian and avian dinosaur eggs. Birds were not the first amniotes to produce coloured eggs: as with many other characteristics 7,8 this is an attribute that evolved deep within the dinosaur tree and long before the spectacular radiation of modern birds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0646-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Archaeopteryx hatchlings were most likely precocial.

    “Like almost all known non-avian dinosaurs and as documented in enantiornithine birds, hatchlings were most likely precocial [104, 105].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [104]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiemann, J., Yang, T.-R., & Norell, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • American Museum of Natural History (US)
Corresponding author
Wiemann, Jasmina
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-10-31
Volume
563
Issue
7732
Pages
555-558
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2899116136
Cited by
83
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
dinosaur eggs, eggshell color, eggshell pigments, micro-Raman spectroscopy, evolutionary origin, dinosaur phylogeny
MeSH terms
Animals, Biliverdine, Color, Egg Shell, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Phylogeny, Pigmentation, Protoporphyrins, Dinosaurs, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review