Cited by 1,764High Entropy Alloys StudiesMicrostructure and mechanical propertiesIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties

Enhanced strength and ductility in a high-entropy alloy via ordered oxygen complexes

Lei, Zhifeng, Liu, Xiongjun, Wu, Yuan, Wang, Hui, Jiang, Suihe, Wang, Shudao, Hui, Xidong, Wu, Yidong +12 more·2018·Nature

Abstract

Oxygen, one of the most abundant elements on Earth, often forms an undesired interstitial impurity or ceramic phase (such as an oxide particle) in metallic materials. Even when it adds strength, oxygen doping renders metals brittle 1-3 . Here we show that oxygen can take the form of ordered oxygen complexes, a state in between oxide particles and frequently occurring random interstitials. Unlike traditional interstitial strengthening 4,5 , such ordered interstitial complexes lead to unprecedented enhancement in both strength and ductility in compositionally complex solid solutions, the so-called high-entropy alloys (HEAs) 6-10 . The tensile strength is enhanced (by 48.5 ± 1.8 per cent) and ductility is substantially improved (by 95.2 ± 8.1 per cent) when doping a model TiZrHfNb HEA with 2.0 atomic per cent oxygen, thus breaking the long-standing strength-ductility trade-off 11 . The oxygen complexes are ordered nanoscale regions within the HEA characterized by (O, Zr, Ti)-rich atomic complexes whose formation is promoted by the existence of chemical short-range ordering among some of the substitutional matrix elements in the HEAs. Carbon has been reported to improve strength and ductility simultaneously in face-centred cubic HEAs 12 , by lowering the stacking fault energy and increasing the lattice friction stress. By contrast, the ordered interstitial complexes described here change the dislocation shear mode from planar slip to wavy slip, and promote double cross-slip and t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0685-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 1,764

Authors
Lei, Z., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Wang, H., Jiang, S., Wang, S., Hui, X., Wu, Y., Gault, B., Kontis, P., Raabe, D., Gu, L., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Wang, H., Liu, J., An, K., Zeng, Q., Nieh, T.-G., & Lu, Z.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials (CN)
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Nachhaltige Materialien (DE)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Chongqing University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research (CN)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-11
Volume
563
Issue
7732
Pages
546-550
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2901546241
Cited by
1,764
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 208 · 2025: 324 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 263 · 2022: 255 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 2
FWCI
69.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Entropy Alloys Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Microstructure and mechanical properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
Keywords
high-entropy alloys, strength-ductility trade-off, chemical short-range ordering, dislocation slip, wavy slip, double cross-slip, Frank-Read sources, strain hardening, interstitial solid solution, oxygen embrittlement, stacking fault energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review