Enhanced strength and ductility in a high-entropy alloy via ordered oxygen complexes
Abstract
Oxygen, one of the most abundant elements on Earth, often forms an undesired interstitial impurity or ceramic phase (such as an oxide particle) in metallic materials. Even when it adds strength, oxygen doping renders metals brittle 1-3 . Here we show that oxygen can take the form of ordered oxygen complexes, a state in between oxide particles and frequently occurring random interstitials. Unlike traditional interstitial strengthening 4,5 , such ordered interstitial complexes lead to unprecedented enhancement in both strength and ductility in compositionally complex solid solutions, the so-called high-entropy alloys (HEAs) 6-10 . The tensile strength is enhanced (by 48.5 ± 1.8 per cent) and ductility is substantially improved (by 95.2 ± 8.1 per cent) when doping a model TiZrHfNb HEA with 2.0 atomic per cent oxygen, thus breaking the long-standing strength-ductility trade-off 11 . The oxygen complexes are ordered nanoscale regions within the HEA characterized by (O, Zr, Ti)-rich atomic complexes whose formation is promoted by the existence of chemical short-range ordering among some of the substitutional matrix elements in the HEAs. Carbon has been reported to improve strength and ductility simultaneously in face-centred cubic HEAs 12 , by lowering the stacking fault energy and increasing the lattice friction stress. By contrast, the ordered interstitial complexes described here change the dislocation shear mode from planar slip to wavy slip, and promote double cross-slip and t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 1,764
- Authors
- Lei, Z., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Wang, H., Jiang, S., Wang, S., Hui, X., Wu, Y., Gault, B., Kontis, P., Raabe, D., Gu, L., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Wang, H., Liu, J., An, K., Zeng, Q., Nieh, T.-G., & Lu, Z.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials (CN)
- Max-Planck-Institut für Nachhaltige Materialien (DE)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Chongqing University (CN)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research (CN)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 563
- Issue
- 7732
- Pages
- 546-550
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2901546241
- Cited by
- 1,764
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 208 · 2025: 324 · 2024: 282 · 2023: 263 · 2022: 255 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 69.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2018-12-19)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Entropy Alloys Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Microstructure and mechanical properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
- Keywords
- high-entropy alloys, strength-ductility trade-off, chemical short-range ordering, dislocation slip, wavy slip, double cross-slip, Frank-Read sources, strain hardening, interstitial solid solution, oxygen embrittlement, stacking fault energy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review