Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet

Yu, X. Z., Koshibae, W., Tokunaga, Y., Shibata, K., Taguchi, Y., Nagaosa, N., Tokura, Y.·2018·Nature

Abstract

Crystal lattices with tetragonal or hexagonal structure often exhibit structural transitions in response to external stimuli 1 . Similar behaviour is anticipated for the lattice forms of topological spin textures, such as lattices composed of merons and antimerons or skyrmions and antiskyrmions (types of vortex related to the distribution of electron spins in a magnetic field), but has yet to be verified experimentally 2,3 . Here we report real-space observations of spin textures in a thin plate of the chiral-lattice magnet Co 8 Zn 9 Mn 3 , which exhibits in-plane magnetic anisotropy. The observations demonstrate the emergence of a two-dimensional square lattice of merons and antimerons from a helical state, and its transformation into a hexagonal lattice of skyrmions in the presence of a magnetic field at room temperature. Sequential observations with decreasing temperature reveal that the topologically protected skyrmions remain robust to changes in temperature, whereas the square lattice of merons and antimerons relaxes to non-topological in-plane spin helices, highlighting the different topological stabilities of merons, antimerons and skyrmions. Our results demonstrate the rich variety of topological spin textures and their lattice forms, and should stimulate further investigation of emergent electromagnetic properties.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0745-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For m = 1, skyrmions with γ = 0 or γ = π are classified as Néel-type and exhibit a hedgehog texture around the quasiparticle.

    “In the case of m = 1, the skyrmions of γ = 0 or γ = π are classified as Néel-type and exhibit a hedgehog texture around the quasiparticle [26].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Kittle, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics Ch. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, (2005).
  2. Lin, S. Z., Saxena, A. & Batista, C. D. Skyrmion fractionalization and merons in chiral magnets with easy-plane anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 91, 224407 (2015). · DOI
  3. Yi, S. D., Onoda, S., Nagaosa, N. & Han, J. H. Skyrmions and anomalous Hall effect in a Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya spiral magnet. Phys. Rev. B 80, 054416 (2009). · DOI
  4. Berdiyorov, G. R., Milošević, M. V. & Peeters, F. M. Vortex configurations and critical parameters in superconducting thin films containing antidote arrays: nonlinear Ginzburg−Landau theory. Phys. Rev. B 74, 174512 (2006). · DOI
  5. Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009). · DOI
  6. Yu, X. Z. et al. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901–904 (2010). · DOI
  7. Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899–911 (2013). · DOI
  8. Tokunaga, Y. et al. A new class chiral materials hosting magnetic skyrmions beyond room temperature. Nat. Commun. 6, 7638 (2015). · DOI
  9. Heinze, S. et al. Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nat. Phys. 7, 713–718 (2011). · DOI
  10. Kézsmárki, I. et al. Néel-type skyrmion lattice with confined orientation in the polar magnetic semiconductor GaV4S8. Nat. Mater. 14, 1116–1122 (2015). · DOI
  11. Li, W. et al. Emergence of skyrmions from rich parent phases in the molybdenum nitrides. Phys. Rev. B 93, 060409(R) (2016). · DOI
  12. Woo, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 15, 501–506 (2016). · DOI
  13. Jiang, W. et al. Blowing magnetic skyrmion bubbles. Science 349, 283–286 (2015). · DOI
  14. Sampaio, J., Cros, V., Rohart, S., Thiaville, A. & Fert, A. Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 839–844 (2013). · DOI
  15. Zheng, F. S. et al. Experimental observation of chiral magnetic bobbers in B20-type FeGe. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 451–455 (2018). · DOI
  16. Nayak, A. K. et al. Magnetic antiskyrmions above room temperature in tetragonal Heusler materials. Nature 548, 561–566 (2017). · DOI
  17. Ozawa, R. et al. Vortex crystals with chiral stripes in itinerant magnets. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 85, 103703 (2016). · DOI
  18. Vousden, M. et al. Skyrmions in thin films with easy-plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 132406 (2016). · DOI
  19. Shinjo, T., Okuno, T., Hassdorf, R., Shigeko, K. & Ono, T. Magnetic vortex core observation in circular dots of permalloy. Science 289, 930–932 (2000). · DOI
  20. Phatak, C., Petford-Long, A. K. & Heinonen, O. Direct observation of unconventional topological spin structure in coupled magnetic discs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 067205 (2012). · DOI
  21. Wintz, S. et al. Topology and origin of effective spin meron pairs in ferromagnetic multilayer elements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 177201 (2013). · DOI
  22. Tan, A. et al. Topology of spin meron pairs in coupled Ni/Fe/Co/Cu (001) disks. Phys. Rev. B 94, 014433 (2016). · DOI
  23. Ishizuka, K. & Allman, B. Phase measurement in electron microscopy using the transport of intensity equation. J. Electron Microsc. 54, 191–197 (2005).
  24. Shibata, K. et al. Large anisotropic deformation of skyrmions in strained crystals. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 589–592 (2015). · DOI
  25. Karube, K. et al. Robust metastable skyrmions and their triangular–square lattice structural transition in a high-temperature chiral magnet. Nat. Mater. 15, 1237–1242 (2016). · DOI
  26. Nakajima, T. et al. Skyrmion lattice structural transition in MnSi. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602562 (2017). · DOI
  27. Oike, H. et al. Interplay between topological and thermodynamic stability in a metastable magnetic skyrmion lattice. Nat. Phys. 12, 62–66 (2016). · DOI
  28. Münzer, W. et al. Skyrmion lattice in the doped semiconductor Fe1−xCoxSi. Phys. Rev. B 81, 041203(R) (2010). · DOI
  29. Yu, X. Z. et al. Aggregation and collapse dynamics of skyrmions in a non-equilibrium state. Nat. Phys. 14, 832–836 (2018). · DOI
  30. Yu, X. Z. et al. Current−induced nucleation and annihilation of magnetic skyrmions at room temperature in a chiral magnet. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606178 (2017). · DOI
  31. Beleggia, M. et al. Quantitative study of magnetic field distribution by electron holography and micromagnetic simulations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1435 (2003). · DOI
  32. Morikawa, D. et al. Deformation of topologically-protected supercooled skyrmions in a thin plate of chiral magnet Co8Zn8Mn4. Nano Lett. 17, 1637–1641 (2017). · DOI
  33. Bogdanov, A. & Hubert, A. Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 138, 255–269 (1994). · DOI
  34. Hubert, A. & Schäfer, R. Magnetic Domains Chs. 2, 3 (Springer, Berlin, 1998).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yu, X. Z., Koshibae, W., Tokunaga, Y., Shibata, K., Taguchi, Y., Nagaosa, N., & Tokura, Y.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-12
Volume
564
Issue
7734
Pages
95-98
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
448
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review