Cited by 277Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Disruption of a self-amplifying catecholamine loop reduces cytokine release syndrome

Open access
Staedtke, Verena, Bai, Ren-Yuan, Kim, Kibem, Darvas, Martin, Davila, Marco L., Riggins, Gregory J., Rothman, Paul B., Papadopoulos, Nickolas +3 more·2018·Nature

Abstract

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a life-threatening complication of several new immunotherapies used to treat cancers and autoimmune diseases 1-5. Here we report that atrial natriuretic peptide can protect mice from CRS induced by such agents by reducing the levels of circulating catecholamines. Catecholamines were found to orchestrate an immunodysregulation resulting from oncolytic bacteria and lipopolysaccharide through a self-amplifying loop in macrophages. Myeloid-specific deletion of tyrosine hydroxylase inhibited this circuit. Cytokine release induced by T-cell-activating therapeutic agents was also accompanied by a catecholamine surge and inhibition of catecholamine synthesis reduced cytokine release in vitro and in mice. Pharmacologic catecholamine blockade with metyrosine protected mice from lethal complications of CRS resulting from infections and various biotherapeutic agents including oncolytic bacteria, T-cell-targeting antibodies and CAR-T cells. Our study identifies catecholamines as an essential component of the cytokine release that can be modulated by specific blockers without impairing the therapeutic response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0774-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Therapy for cytokine release syndrome and its neurological toxicity chiefly targets IL-6, which probably originates from monocytes or activated endothelial cells.

    “Treatment for CRS and associated neurotoxicity primarily targets IL-6, likely arising from monocytes or activated endothelium [1, 6, 11–17].”

    From Immune reconstitution and clinical recovery following anti-CD28 antibody (TGN1412)-induced cytokine storm (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

    The paper reports testing IL-6 receptor blockade for CRS in mice, with a significant but marginal survival benefit, and identifies IL-6 among myeloid-derived cytokines (main text, labelled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable). It does not establish that treatment for CRS and associated neurotoxicity primarily targets IL-6, or that activated endothelium is a likely source of IL-6. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 277

Authors
Staedtke, V., Bai, R.-Y., Kim, K., Darvas, M., Davila, M. L., Riggins, G. J., Rothman, P. B., Papadopoulos, N., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., & Zhou, S.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Staedtke, Verena
  • Bai, Ren-Yuan
  • Vogelstein, Bert
  • Zhou, Shibin
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-12-12
Volume
564
Issue
7735
Pages
273-277
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2903675281
Cited by
277
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (K08CA230179, R03CA178118, P50CA062924, K12CA090625, U54CA196519)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R25NS065729)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
cytokine release syndrome, catecholamines, atrial natriuretic peptide, tyrosine hydroxylase, macrophages, oncolytic bacteria, lipopolysaccharide, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, immunotherapy toxicity, immune dysregulation, anti-inflammatory peptides
MeSH terms
Animals, Catecholamines, Epinephrine, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Atrial Natriuretic Factor, Norepinephrine, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Syndrome, T-Lymphocytes, Cytokines, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, CD3 Complex, alpha-Methyltyrosine, Myeloid Cells, Mice, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review