Cited by 95Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingNeural Networks and ApplicationsNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classification with a disordered dopant-atom network in silicon

Open access

Abstract

Classification is an important task at which both biological and artificial neural networks excel 1,2. In machine learning, nonlinear projection into a high-dimensional feature space can make data linearly separable 3,4, simplifying the classification of complex features. Such nonlinear projections are computationally expensive in conventional computers. A promising approach is to exploit physical materials systems that perform this nonlinear projection intrinsically, because of their high computational density 5, inherent parallelism and energy efficiency 6,7. However, existing approaches either rely on the systems' time dynamics, which requires sequential data processing and therefore hinders parallel computation 5,6,8, or employ large materials systems that are difficult to scale up 7. Here we use a parallel, nanoscale approach inspired by filters in the brain 1 and artificial neural networks 2 to perform nonlinear classification and feature extraction. We exploit the nonlinearity of hopping conduction 9-11 through an electrically tunable network of boron dopant atoms in silicon, reconfiguring the network through artificial evolution to realize different computational functions. We first solve the canonical two-input binary classification problem, realizing all Boolean logic gates 12 up to room temperature, demonstrating nonlinear classification with the nanomaterial system. We then evolve our dopant network to realize feature filters 2 that can perform four-input binary classification on the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology handwritten digit database. Implementation of our material-based filters substantially improves the classification accuracy over that of a linear classifier directly applied to the original data 13. Our results establish a paradigm of silicon-based electronics for small-footprint and energy-efficient computation 14.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1901-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DNPUs are nanoscale, highly nonlinear and tunable devices fabricated in silicon, conceivably CMOS compatible.

    “For instance, dopant network processing units (DNPUs) are nanoscale, highly nonlinear and tunable devices fabricated in silicon, conceivably, CMOS compatible [152, 153].”
  • Incorporating memristive devices with novel tunable non-linear devices could improve the efficiency of in-memory computing systems.

    “Incorporating memristive devices with novel tunable non-linear devices [128] could improve the efficiency of in-memory computing systems.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. J. Physiol. 148, 574–591 (1959). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Haykin, S. Neural Networks and Learning Machines (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008).
  3. Cover, T. M. Geometrical and statistical properties of systems of linear inequalities with applications in pattern recognition. IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. EC-14, 326–334 (1965).
  4. Torrejon, J. et al. Neuromorphic computing with nanoscale spintronic oscillators. Nature 547, 428–431 (2017). · DOI
  5. Tanaka, G. et al. Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: a review. Neural Netw. 115, 100–123 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Du, C. et al. Reservoir computing using dynamic memristors for temporal information processing. Nat. Commun. 8, 2204 (2017). · DOI
  7. Hung, C. S. & Gliessman, J. R. Resistivity and Hall effect of germanium at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. 96, 1226–1236 (1954). · DOI
  8. Mott, N. F. Conduction in glasses containing transition metal ions. J. Non Cryst. Solids 1, 1–17 (1968). · DOI
  9. Gantmakher, V. F. Electrons and Disorder in Solids (Clarendon Press, 2005). · DOI
  10. Bose, S. K. et al. Evolution of a designless nanoparticle network into reconfigurable Boolean logic. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 1048–1052 (2015). · DOI
  11. Zabrodskii, A. G. & Zinov’eva, K. N. Low-temperature conductivity and metal-insulator transition in compensate n-Ge. Sov. Phys. JETP 59, 425–433 (1984).
  12. Jenderka, M. et al. Mott variable-range hopping and weak antilocalization effect in heteroepitaxial Na2IrO2 thin films. Phys. Rev. B 88, 045111 (2013). · DOI
  13. Miller, J. F. & Downing, K. Evolution in materio: looking beyond the silicon box. In Proc. 2002 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware 167–176 (IEEE, 2002). · DOI
  14. Harding, S. & Miller, J. F. Evolution in materio: a tone discriminator in liquid crystal. In Proc. 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation 1800–1807 (IEEE, 2004). · DOI
  15. Mohid, M. & Miller, J. F. Evolving robot controllers using carbon nanotubes. In Proc. 13th European Conference on Artificial Life 106–113 (MIT Press, 2015). · DOI
  16. Wolfram, S. Approaches to complexity engineering. Physica D 22, 385–399 (1986). · DOI
  17. Backus, J. Can programming be liberated from the von Neumann style? A functional style and its algebra of programs. Commun. ACM 21, 613–641 (1978). · DOI
  18. Maass, W., Natschläger, T. & Markram, H. Real-time computing without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Comput. 14, 2531–2560 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dale, M., Stepney, S., Miller, J. F. & Trefzer, M. Reservoir computing in materio: an evaluation of configuration through evolution. In 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 1–8 (IEEE, 2016). · DOI
  20. Björk, M. T., Schmid, H., Knoch, J., Riel, H. & Riess, W. Donor deactivation in silicon nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 103–107 (2009). · DOI
  21. Pierre, M. et al. Single-donor ionization energies in a nanoscale CMOS channel. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 133–137 (2010). · DOI
  22. Hartstein, A. & Fowler, A. B. High temperature ‘variable range hopping’ conductivity in silicon inversion layers. J. Phys. C 8, L249–L253 (1975). · DOI
  23. Minsky, M. & Papert, S. Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry (MIT Press, 1969).
  24. Chen, T. et al. DianNao: a small-footprint high-throughput accelerator for ubiquitous machine-learning. ACM SIGPLAN Not. 49, 269–284 (2014). · DOI
  25. Lee, J. et al. UNPU: an energy-efficient deep neural network accelerator with fully variable weight bit precision. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 54, 173–185 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Li, C. et al. Analogue signal and image processing with large memristor crossbars. Nat. Electron. 1, 52–59 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Tapson, J. & van Schaik, A. Learning the pseudoinverse solution to network weights. Neural Netw. 45, 94–100 (2013). · DOI
  28. Such, F. P. et al. Deep neuroevolution: genetic algorithms are a competitive alternative for training deep neural networks for reinforcement learning. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06567 (2017). · arXiv
  29. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, L. J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980 (2015). · arXiv
  30. Aharony, A., Zhang, Y. & Sarachik, M. P. Universal crossover in variable range hopping with Coulomb interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3900–3903 (1992). · DOI
  31. Pettersson, J. et al. Extending the high-frequency limit of a single-electron transistor by on-chip impedance transformation. Phys. Rev. B 53, R13272–R13274 (1996). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, T., van Gelder, J., van de Ven, B., Amitonov, S. V., de Wilde, B., Ruiz Euler, H.-C., Broersma, H., Bobbert, P. A., Zwanenburg, F. A., & van der Wiel, W. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
van der Wiel, Wilfred G.
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-01-15
Volume
577
Issue
7790
Pages
341-345
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2999145262
Cited by
95
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Keywords
silicon photonics, boron-doped silicon, hopping conduction, nonlinear classification, feature extraction, artificial neural networks, artificial evolution, Boolean logic gates, handwritten digit recognition, energy-efficient computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review